Trinity County Grand Jury • 2011-2012 • Agency Response

Response Problems

Published: April 11, 2012
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1 Page 4
As of the writing of this report, two (2) responses were received 90 days past their due date, two (2) were received 280 days past their due date and five (5) responses have not been received at all (45%), which is non-compliant with the Penal Code Section previously cited.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 4
Identify and correct the reasons the reports are not being responded to in a timely manner by the Penal Code mandated time frame.
F2 Page 4
Copies of report responses are not being provided to the Grand Jury as required in the County's Policy Statement 3-90 (P) per Item Three (3). 3
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 5
Provide copies of the response to the Grand Jury as set forth in the identified Item Three (3) of the County Policy Statement.
F3 Page 5
An interconnected tracking system that meets the needs of the primary entities is non-existent. This adds to the County's inability to comply with the law as stated in the Penal Code Section 933 (c).
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 5
The Court Services, the Chairman of the Board of Superviso::-s, and the CAO, working in conjunction, should create a interconnected tracking system that will facilitate the time frame . requirements of the law.