📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 18
The CPS Policies and Procedures do not include concise and usable information leaving staff little direction how to perform their job duties.
F2
Page 18
There are no Policies/Procedures on training or education of CPS Staff Members.
F3
Page 18
CPS does not follow what is outlined in policy leaving the manual with no value.
F4
Page 18
The Policies/Procedures manual does not have any Policy/Procedure on the specific handling of SCARS.
F5
Page 18
The Director of Social Services is not involved with the CPS department leaving them with little oversight and guidance.
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 18The Grand Jury recommends that the CPS policy manual be completely reviewed and rewritten including an Index, Table of Contents and be electronically available by June 2025.
-
R2Page 18The Grand Jury recommends that the CAO review the administrative structure of the Department of Social Services to assure adequate supervision is provided by December 2024.
-
R3Page 18The Grand Jury recommends that the website include a complete report to the BOS and the public on the status of CPS by October 2024.
-
R4Page 18The Grand Jury recommends that the MOU currently in place with other agencies be followed as written.