📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 8 findings
F1
Page 33
It is reported that the City of Merced has a zero tolerance policy for sexual harassment.
F2
Page 33
Asexual harassment and hostile work environment claim was filed with the Director of Support Services.
F3
Page 33
The investigation of the claim began with the Chief of Police.
F4
Page 33
The Chief of Police was directed by the City of Merced Director of Support Services to halt the investigation and turn over the investigation to her .
F5
Page 33
The claim was denied by the Director of Support Services.
F6
Page 33
During the interview process, the Law Committee noted extreme inconsistencies in the form of conflicting testimony by staff members.
F7
Page 33
It was noted and acknowledged that sexual harassment complaints are very difficult to review due to the nature of such situations.
F8
Page 33
The complainant filed a complaint with the California State Department of Fair Employment and Housing (1320 E. Shaw Ave., Suite 150, Fresno) and awaits action.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 33It is a conflict of interest to have a sexual harassment complaint by an employee of the City of Merced investigated by another employee of the City of Merced . An independent panel should review sexual harassment or hostile work environment claims.
-
R2Page 33Procedures and protocol for reporting sexual harassment needs to be understood and followed by all employees of the City of Merced and its representatives . 2002-2003 Grand JuryReuort