📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
San Joaquin County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Stockton Unified School District (Follow-Up)
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
Page 47
SUSD Trustees reduce the dollar cap that can be spent for non-instructional and
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 47
SUSD Trustees limit the use of non-instructional and administrative consultants to
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 47
SUSD Trustees re-examine the policy of allowing the Superintendent to create positions and hire employees without a competitive application process. Board of Education Response: This recommendation will not be implemented at this time. 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: This recommendation has been partially implemented. The Superintendent retains the ability to create positions and hire without competitive process. The Grand Jury believes the Superintendent used the power wisely when reorganizing SUSD administration. Most administrative positions were filled with qualified personnel from the pool of current SUSD employees, rather than going outside the District.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 47
SUSD Trustees conduct a thorough, independent audit of restricted (categorical) funds
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 48
SUSD Trustees or a committee of Trustees periodically review purchases made by
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 48
SUSD Trustees carefully review the budget and question policy decisions made by SUSD
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Page 48
SUSD Trustees review and approve plans for future District-wide fund raising activities.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 48
SUSD management provide thorough and accurate accounting of all district-wide fund
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Page 49
SUSD Trustees ensure SUSD management is held accountable for their actions. Board of Education Response: This recommendation is being implemented. 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: This recommendation has been implemented. Three new Trustees were elected in November 2008 and a new management team is in place.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 49
SUSD Trustees and management work as a team to accomplish common objectives and not lose sight of the District’s mission which is to educate the children of the District. Board of Education Response: This recommendation has been implemented. 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: This recommendation has been implemented. SUSD has a solid management team in place. The Superintendent has vision and is a strong proponent of improving student outcome. He is looking at all facets of SUSD and implementing necessary changes.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Page 49
The Board of Trustees manage the recent bond measure in a timely and effective manner and regain the public’s confidence. Board of Education Response: This recommendation has been implemented. 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: This recommendation has been implemented. The Board established a Citizen’s Bond Oversight Committee to oversee both Measure C and Measure Q Bonds. The Superintendent has proposed numerous changes to proposed bond projects. Current plans for high school renovation may be replaced with plans to build new high schools. 12. (No recommendation #12 from the 2007\2008 Grand Jury) 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: The Superintendent and Trustees took a calculated risk in using the Success for All program. The program was not approved for use by the California Department of Education. The Grand Jury believes this risk was justified. 13. (No recommendation #13 from the 2007/2008 Grand Jury) 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: The Superintendent and Trustees took a calculated risk in offering SAT testing and preparation training at no cost to students. Approximately 70% of seniors participated, up from 8% the year before. Again, the Grand Jury believes the risk was justified. 14. (No recommendation #14 from the 2007/2008 Grand Jury) 2008/2009 Grand Jury Finding: The Superintendent resides within Stockton city limits and within the Lodi Unified School District. A family member was enrolled in a SUSD 30 pre-school program targeted to disadvantaged youth. All supporting documentation was reviewed by the Grand Jury and appeared to be in order. Further, the Superintendent kept a promise he made to enroll family members at SUSD.
No recommendations for this finding