Was Justice Served?

Published: June 27, 2012 5 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

The Cloverdale Police Department showed no partiality in favor of the juvenile during the investigation of this case.

No recommendations for this finding

The case was adjudicated before the investigation had been completed.

No recommendations for this finding

The Cloverdale Police Department followed all appropriate procedures to detain and arrest the juvenile, and proper documents were submitted to the District Attorney’s Office within the prescribed time allotted for filing.

No recommendations for this finding

While this case was adjudicated very quickly, it was not outside the realm of normalcy for cases in which the juvenile admits guilt.

No recommendations for this finding

The District Attorney’s Office failed to comply with Marsy’s Law as it relates to the complainant.

Related Recommendations (1)

The Sonoma County District Attorney’s Office ensure strict adherence to Marsy’s Law.

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

R2

The District Attorney implement procedures to improve communication with all Sonoma County law enforcement agencies.

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

CITY OF

September 13, 2012 • 2 pages • 1 response • Score: +1 (+1, 0, 0) View Details ▾

PDF

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sonoma County District Attorney Elected County Office