⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
The LRA does not make all costs, schedules or contract issues easily accessible to the public.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The LRA should consider holding regular LRA meetings, separate from the City Council meetings.
F2
The LRA is using the City’s existing budgeting cost system which lacks information about forecasted costs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
To increase transparency, the LRA should consider posting agendas, minutes and video of the LRA (including the CAC meetings) on its website.
F3
The LRA website does not provide all relevant information that the LRA has available about the reuse process.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The LRA should consider instructing staff to issue regular written periodic projects reports containing relevant information and current status, and to post the report on the LRA website to increase public awareness.
F4
The LRA staff provides an oral report to the LRA and/or the City Council on average once a quarter.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The LRA should consider creating a project execution plan in accordance with accepted program management standards as soon as possible, but no later than at the completion of the specific plan.
F5
During the extended, simultaneous negotiations with two master developer finalists in 2015, the city manager removed the recommendation for a master developer from the LRA staff’s report.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The LRA should consider selecting a master developer prior to negotiating a Term Sheet in future phases of the project.
F6
The City Council sometimes conducts LRA business without publicly announcing that it is acting as the LRA.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The LRA should consider using a project management software system which would include project cost forecasting capabilities.
F7
No comprehensive plan exists that encompasses all Concord Naval Weapon Station Reuse project activities.
No recommendations for this finding
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Concord
City