Nevada County Grand Jury • 1997-1998

Nevada County Eric Rood Administration Building Reason for Investigation*

2 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
Director of general services is responsible for the maintenance of all county facilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
There are deficiencies with the emergency lighting system in the Rood Building.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The emergency lighting problems were identified by the Facilities-Systems Advisors Report submitted to the Board of Supervisors March 1997 by a citizen's group.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
There are no written facility maintenance and inspection procedures for the Rood Building. Maintenance inspection procedures for county facilities are scheduled to be prepared later this year (1998) with help from an outside organization.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends that facilities management develop and implement maintenance and safety procedures that will adhere to state and federal guidelines.
F5
Personnel who find maintenance or safety deficiencies report them to their supervisors who forward them to facility management.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Limited funds and personnel are allocated to the maintenance of county facilities. CONCLUSIONS
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that the facilities management yearly budget should be adequately funded for maintenance and materials to correct the above problems.

Conclusions 3

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Nevada County County
Nevada County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.