Orange County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Orange County Grand Jury 2004-2005

Published: November 02, 2004 16 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 1 findings

F7
4.4, .) 8.4.3 County election officials should explore the possibility of combining the various voting methods used in the November 2nd election. (See Para. 7.3, Election Day, finding 7.3.1, ; and Para. 7.4, The Count, finding 7.4.2, .) 8.4.4 The ROV should address mechanical difficulties encountered in processing paper ballots. (See Para. 7.4, The Count, finding 7.4.3, .) Responses to Recommendations 8.1.3 (Poll Worker Training); 8.3.2 (Election Day); and 8.4.1, 8.4.2, and 8.4.3 (The Count) are required from the Board of Supervisors. Responses to Recommendations 8.1.1 through 8.1.3 (Poll Worker Training), 8.2.1 through 8.2.4 (Early Voting), 8.3.1 through 8.3.4 (Election Day), and 8.4.1 through 8.4.4 (The Count) are requested from the Registrar of Voters. 9. Commendation To the management and staff of Orange County’s Registrar of Voters Office and to the thousands of temporary workers recruited to conduct the November 2, 2004, general election, . Bibliography (cid:131) State of California Elections Code (cid:131) “Identification of 2004 March Primary Election Issues,” Orange County Board of Supervisors Subcommittee on Elections, May 18, 2004.

Recommendations 2

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.