Butte County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Butte County*

Published: March 02, 2009 8 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
the compensation packages of twelve other counties. Some of the counties did not have comparable cost of living or socio-economic parameters. As an incentive to save sick leave, the County offers three options for converting
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
When comparing employee compensation packages, negotiate to replace counties such as Sacramento, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Napa, with counties having comparable cost of living and socio-economic parameters to those of Butte County
F2
unused sick leave upon retirement. The rationale for offering incentives to save sick leave appears valid. Under the nine recently expired bargaining unit MOUs, the County pays the full
No recommendations for this finding
F3
cost of medical insurance premiums for retirees who qualify for CalPERS retirement and have accumulated sick leave savings. During open enrollment, the retiree may elect to change to a higher benefit plan with the County paying the increased premium. In most cases, the medical insurance benefit exceeds the hourly rate paid to the
No recommendations for this finding
F4
employee prior to retirement. Medical insurance premiums for about 120 County retirees are currently costing the County nearly $1 million per year. As medical premiums rise and more employees retire with accumulated sick leave, these costs will increase. It is difficult for the County to predict or budget for retiree medical insurance
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
Continue to offer cash payments and length of service extension for unused sick leave, but negotiate to change the medical insurance premium benefit to a shared cost, similar to that formula used to determine the portion of the medical insurance premium paid by the County for employees prior to retirement. For example, in the new Bargaining Unit MOUs being negotiated, fix the County's monthly contribution for retiree medical insurance premiums and require the retiree to pay the remainder.
R3
For current retirees with vested retirement rights, continue to have the County pay the total cost of health insurance premiums. For future retirees, negotiate to modify the current practice which permits retirees to move to a higher plan at the County's expense. Negotiate to have the retiree pay the difference in premiums.
F5
premiums, due to the County's lack of control over insurance premium increases and employee decisions to retire. The County is in the process of negotiating new agreements with the nine
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
Continue to offer cash payments and length of service extension for unused sick leave, but negotiate to change the medical insurance premium benefit to a shared cost, similar to that formula used to determine the portion of the medical insurance premium paid by the County for employees prior to retirement. For example, in the new Bargaining Unit MOUs being negotiated, fix the County's monthly contribution for retiree medical insurance premiums and require the retiree to pay the remainder.
R3
For current retirees with vested retirement rights, continue to have the County pay the total cost of health insurance premiums. For future retirees, negotiate to modify the current practice which permits retirees to move to a higher plan at the County's expense. Negotiate to have the retiree pay the difference in premiums.
F6
bargaining units, which provides an opportunity to renegotiate this benefit.
No recommendations for this finding

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Butte County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
County of Butte Agency

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.