📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Placer County Grand Jury 2024-2025 Final Report Loomis Form 700 Filing Summary All Filers

18 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 18 findings

F1 Page 138
Auburn, Lincoln, Loomis, Rocklin, and Roseville reviewed, amended, and/or adopted conflict of interest codes in 2024, in compliance with Government Code 87306 and 87306.5.
F2 Page 138
Since Colfax did not provide a resolution showing its Conflict of Interest Code was reviewed in 2024, the Placer County Grand Jury was unable to determine whether Colfax conducted a biennial review of its Conflict of Interest Code in 2024.
F3 Page 138
Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Loomis, Rocklin, and Roseville have incorporated the State of California Model Code into their conflict of interest codes, bringing them into compliance with State law.
F4 Page 138
Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Loomis, Rocklin, and Roseville designate Form 700 filers in their conflict of interest codes, ensuring compliance with State law.
F5 Page 138
Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Loomis, Rocklin, and Roseville identify the city clerk as the filing officer for Form 700 filers.
F6 Page 138
Roseville includes Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training in its Conflict of Interest Code.
F7 Page 138
Roseville assigns responsibility to the city clerk for Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training.
F8 Page 138
Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Loomis, and Rocklin do not include Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training requirements in their conflict of interest codes.
F9 Page 138
Roseville does address enforcement authority in its Conflict of Interest Code, which states there may be consequences if a designated individual fails to timely file Form 700 or complete Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training.
F10 Page 138
Auburn, Colfax, Lincoln, Loomis, and Rocklin do not include enforcement authority in their conflict of interest codes, leaving no defined consequences 130 or complete Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training. Form 700
F11 Page 139
Across all local agencies, most of the individuals who did not timely file Form 700 were designated filers.
F12 Page 139
For Colfax, Lincoln and Loomis, incomplete information in recordkeeping for designated Form 700 filers prevented the grand jury from accurately assessing the timeliness of the filings.
F13 Page 139
As a general matter, insufficient oversight by the local agencies has contributed to untimely Form 700 filings for designated filers. Ethics Training
F14 Page 139
Auburn and Rocklin currently place responsibility for Assembly Bill 1234 Ethics Training on their Human Resource/Administrative Services staff.
F15 Page 139
Across all local agencies, insufficient oversight resulted in many individuals not receiving ethics training by the deadline set by State law.
F16 Page 139
Across all local agencies, overreliance on the individual to schedule and receive ethics training resulted in untimely training.
F17 Page 139
contain necessary information.
F18 Page 139
A lack of enforcement authority within all local agencies led to failures to receive timely ethics training.

Recommendations 6