Orange County Grand Jury
• 1999-2000
A Child is Waiting… and Waiting… to Be Adopted in Orange County
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 9 findings
F1
Orange County Social Services Agency Adoption Unit has an insufficient number of available adoptive parents because it does not have sufficient recruiting programs. A response to Finding 1 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Funding should be increased for adoption recruitment to provide creative and effective recruiting programs to reach families in the community who are interested in providing foster and adoptive parenting. A response to Recommendation 1 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F2
There are many adoptive-assistance programs available to prospective adoptive families that could be better promoted. Wider promotion of such programs would help recruit prospective adoptive families. A response to Finding 2 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Social Services Agency should detail in a brochure the Adoption Assistance Program and the many other financial, educational, mental health, and other health benefits available to adoptive families. A response to Recommendation 2 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F3
Consistent decision-making guidelines for social workers and management are not available. This is a critical factor given the high turnover rate of social workers in the Adoptions Unit. A response to Finding 3 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Social Services Agency should develop a framework and guidelines to assist social workers in timely decision-making in adoptions, based on well-researched clinical practices. A response to Recommendation 3 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 23
F4
Many children in foster care are placed in several locations and homes, often separated from all that is familiar and secure to them. A response to Finding 4 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Social Services Agency Adoption Program should develop specific assessment guidelines to determine the needs of each individual child for placement in the appropriate foster care home to diminish the likelihood of multiple moves. If multiple moves are necessary, the importance of maintaining meaningful connections between placements should be considered. A response to Recommendation 4 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F5
Often there is a delay in the adoptive process because of inattentiveness to the proper matching of children with foster families at the very beginning of out-of-home placement. A response to Finding 5 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 21
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Greater communication and collaboration should be promoted between the different units of the Social Services Agency, which would create a consistency and a framework for permanency planning for every child at the very beginning of an out-of-home placement. A response to Recommendation 5 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F6
Brothers and sisters have been separated when placed in foster homes and also when placed in permanent homes. A response to Finding 6 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Social Services Agency should develop guidelines concerning sibling adoptions. A response to Recommendation 6 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F7
More children are entering the child welfare and foster care system, and as a result the County social workers are overloaded with too many cases. The rate of burnout and turnover among social workers is alarmingly high, resulting in a workforce that is chronically inexperienced and under-trained. The personnel crisis, insufficient number of staff members, high turnover, and inexperience, has a detrimental effect on the quality of services provided. A response to Finding 7 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The budget for the Social Services Agency should be increased to employ and retain more qualified social workers. The Social Services Agency should consider following the recommendations of the National Association of Social Workers and limit cases to 25 per social worker. A response to Recommendation 7 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F8
Because the waiting time for placement is so long and because worker turnover is high, families and children are forced to work with many different social workers. There is frustration and loss of confidence by both adoptive parents and the waiting child when they have to deal with numerous social workers, sometimes as many as five. A response to Finding 8 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Social Services Agency should appoint one social worker team that collaborates, cooperates, and communicates with each unit at each step of the foster-adoptive process for each child. A response to Recommendation 8 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
F9
The Social Services Agency recently implemented a concurrent pilot project. The Concurrent Planning Program has not been completely understood nor embraced by many County social workers. As a result there can be delays of one to two years in case resolutions. A response to Finding 9 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 10.The Social Service s Agency completes an AFCARS report every six months for each child in the welfare system. The agency also conducts reviews of the children who have a reunification plan and for children who have a plan of permanent placement. It is not clear how often these reviews are held and who contributes to the reviews. A response to Finding 10 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 11.A major complaint of adoptive families is that they are unaware of where they stand in the adoptive process. There has been a lack of communication between the social workers and the adoptive parents during the adoption process. A response to Finding 11 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 22 12.Post-adoptive communication and assistance has been minimal for many adoption families. A response to Finding 12 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 13.The survey of the Orange County adoptive parents initiated by the Grand Jury and implemented by the Social Services Agency was most informative and useful in evaluating the adoption program in Orange County. A response to Finding 13 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 14.The valuable input from adoptive parents in the survey and successful outsourcing by the Social Services Agency with private adoption agencies illustrates the valuable resources that are available from the private sector. A response to Finding 14 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The Social Services Agency should provide concurrent planning instructions to all social workers in all adoption units. The agency should follow the mandate of recent federal and state law and promote a realistic and viable concurrent planning program. A response to Recommendation 9 is requested from the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services. 24 10.Social Services Agency should conduct a six-month review for each out-of-home case. The Agency should implement a process of case staffings. These staffings should be attended by all currently assigned social workers and other staff and/or professionals who have knowledge and interest in the child. These staffings will lead to greater communication and collaboration between the different social worker units of the dependency and adoption process. A response to Recommendation 10 is required from the Board of Supervisors and requested from the Social Services Agency. 11.The Social Services Agency should communicate on a monthly basis with each adoptive family regarding where they stand and what is happening in their adoption process. A response to Recommendation 11 is requested from the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services. 12.After the adoption has been finalized, the Social Service Agency should be in monthly contact with the adoption family for at least one year, providing adequate post-adoptive services. A response to Recommendation 12 is requested from the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services. 13.The Social Services Agency should conduct an annual survey of recent adoption families to evaluate the adoption program and to use their input and recommendations to improve the performance of the County’s adoption program. A response to Recommendation 13 is requested from the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services. 14.An Advisory Committee should be established immediately to bring the resources and insights of the entire continuum of care, both public and private, and to oversee the development of an integrated plan for the Orange County foster and adoption system. A response to Recommendation 14 is requested from the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services.
Additional Recommendations 5
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R11-15yrs. 6% 11-15 yrs. 23%
-
R13-24months 22% Emancipation 7%
-
R16-18yrs. .002% 16-18 yrs. 3% 2. ADOPTION How many months have the waiting Where were the waiting children living on children been in continuous foster care? March 31, 1999? Mean Mos 46 Pre-adoptive home 15% Median Mos 38 Foster Family Home 21% (Relative) Less than 1 month .004% Foster Family Home 56% 1 through 5 mos 3% (Non-relative) 6 through 11 mos 6% Group home 3% 12 through 17 mos 8% Institution 4% 18 through 23 mos 10% Supervised Independent 1 24 through 29 mos 10% Living, runaway, etc, 30 through 35 mos 9% 36 through 59 mos 26% 60 0r more mos 27% 31 3. ADOPTIONS 36,000 children were adopted from the public foster care system in FY 1998. How old were the children when they were How many months did it take after termination adopted from the public foster care system? of parental rights for the children to be adopted? Mean yrs. 6.9 Mean mos 17 Median yrs. 6.3 Median mos 13 Under 1 year 2% 1 month 2.5% 1-5 years 46% 1-5 months 16% 6-10 years 37% 6-11 months 30%
-
R25-36months 13% Long-term foster care 5% 3-4 years 15% Case plan goal not yet 5 years or more 18% established 20% 32 6. FOSTER CARE 119,000 children entered foster care during 102,000 exited foster care during this period. the period of 10/1/98 through 3/31/99. What were the ages of the children who What were the ages of the children who entered care during this six month period? exited care during this six-month period? Mean Years 8.7 Mean Years 10.2 Medean Years 8.8 Median Years 10.2 Under 1 year 13% Under 1 year 4% 1 thru 5 years 24% 1 thru 5 years 26% 6 thru 10 years 22% 6 thru 10 years 23% 11 thru 15 years 29% 11 thru 15 years 24% 16 thru 18 years 11% 16 thru 18 yrs 20% 19+ years 3% 7. FOSTER CARE 102,000 children exited foster care during the period 10/1/98 through 3/31/99. What were the lengths of stay of the What were the outcomes for the children children who exited during this period? exiting foster care during this period? Mean months 22 Reunification 59% Median months 11 Living with relatives 10% 1 month 19% Adoption 15% 1 to 5 months 18% Emancipation 6% 6 to 11 months 14% Guardianship 2% 12 to 17 months 11% Transfer to another 3% 18 to 23 months 8% agency 24 to 29 months 6% Runaway 3% 30 to 35 months 4% 3 to 4 years 10% 5 yrs. or more 10% As of March 31, 1999, 44,000 children living in foster care were legally free to be adopted. As of March 31, 1999, how many months had elapsed since the court had terminated the parental rights and declared these children legally free to be adopted? Mean months 23 months Median months 14 months 33
-
R30-35months 4% 3-5 years 9.5% 4. FOSTER CARE 547,000 Children were in foster care on March 31, 1999. What were the ages of the children Where were these children in foster care living? In foster care? Mean years 9.9 Pre-adoptive home 3% Median years 10.0 Foster Family (Relative) 27% Under 1 year 3% Group home 8% 1 thru 5 years 25% Foster Family (non Relative)47% 6 thru 10 years 27% Institution 10% 11 thru 15 years 27 % Independent Living Program 1% 16 thru 18 years 16% Trial Home Visit 3% 19+ years 2% 5. FOSTER CARE What were the lengths of stay for What were the case goals of the children the children in foster care? In foster care? Mean months 33 Reunify with parents 41% Median months 22 Live with other relatives 4% 1 month 3% Adoption 20% 1-12 months 29% Guardianship 3%
Conclusions 1
-
CL1There are three serious problems in the Orange County adoption system. Orange County does not have a sufficient number of available adoptive While these achievements are parents. Only 102 families were approved by the significant, the challenges Social Services Agency for adoption in the last six ahead are even greater. Since months of 1999. The paucity of adoptive parents 1996 the annual number of for special-needs children is critical in Orange foster children freed for adoption has increased by 130 County. There is a great need for recruitment but percent. This increase is the the funds are very scarce. most accurate predictor of the need for increased adoption Social workers are overworked; caseloads vary activity. As noted in the from 30 to 80. The rate of burnout and turnover summary, 2,490 children were among social workers is alarmingly high, resulting placed in the category of Long- in a workforce that is inexperienced and under- Term Permanent Placement (i.e., children for whom re-unification trained. Staffing is a very serious issue facing the was either unsuccessful or not child welfare system in Orange County. It is possible). Of this number, 15 difficult to recruit and retain good social workers. percent, or 374 children were adopted. While adoptions in Also, Orange County mirrors the state and the Orange County increased by 44 nation in the lack of decision-making guidelines. percent between fiscal years 1998 and 1999, the number of However, attempts are being made by the Orange adoptions as a percent of County SSA to help social workers make decisions children available for adoption with greater input from supervisors. The Grand increased by only 14 percent. Jury conducted a survey and interviewed many adoptive parents regarding their experiences with these issues during the adoptive process. Table 4 provides insight into the effectiveness and timeliness of the procedures used in the Orange County Adoption Program. 18 TABLE 4 SURVEY OF ORANGE COUNTY ADOPTIVE PARENTS A REPORT ON EXPERIENCES WITH THE ADOPTIVE PROGRAM % Less % Very % Fairly than Process Effective Effective Effective % Poor Orientation 50 28.5 18 3.5 Training 50 32 7 11 Responsiveness of Social 64 14 8 14 Workers Expertise of Social Workers 60 16 9 15 Juvenile Court Hearings 50 29 10 11 Timeliness of the Process 28 18 11 43 The survey asked each adoptive parent what they found most helpful and least helpful when going through the adoption process. They were also asked to make their own comments. There were very few comments regarding orientation and training. The anger and frustration expressed in the survey was a result of long waiting times. The majority of the comments referenced the social workers. There were many complimentary statements for the social workers i.e., “They were very supportive and have made themselves available after the adoptions were finalized.” Many defended their social workers and stated that they were overwhelmed with heavy caseloads. Some complained regarding the number of social workers involved; two families had five social workers. Others complained about the inexperience of social workers and a lack of consistency in opinions and decisions. There was no middle ground in the love/hate relationship with the social workers. The adoption system is failing in many ways. Of primary concern is the improbability of adoption from foster care. Under permanency planning the system’s goal is to either reunify children or, if reunification A major concern efforts fail, to place them in an adoptive home. Placement in is the fact that long-term care is supposed to occur only as a last resort for the odds of adoption fall as children who are “unadoptable.” Under the current system, the the child’s age number of children that will be placed in long-term care is three rises. times the number that will be placed in adoptive homes. Another concern is the fact that the odds of adoption fall as the child’s age rises. This highlights the importance of timely and accurate reunification decisions. As durations increase, the likelihood of permanent placement fails. 19 Finally, many children within the child welfare system spend two to three years waiting to be adopted after the state has determined that they will not be reunified with their family. Because the likelihood of adoption decreases as the child gets older, it is critical to minimize the amount of time to move the child into the ranks of those eligible for adoption. Given the following statistics, it is difficult to justify the hope that a child will return home after being in foster care beyond one year. · Over 40 percent of the children entering foster care will never be reunified with their families. · Of the children who do return home, nearly 50 percent are reunified within six months, while 70 percent go home within a year. · One third of the children in care had been in the system at least three times. · Only 5 percent of children who were in foster care for longer than 24 months were returned home. · Two out of five foster children will spend more than three years in foster care. · The average foster child has been in two different homes. Nearly one-third of foster children have been in three or more homes. One of every ten children in foster care has been placed into five or more homes. The fundamental problem remains an overall lack of accountability mechanisms. County agencies are free to build whatever barriers they wish, however inadvertent these barriers may be. They should be held accountable for their own failure to place children. A glaring example of counties doing their own thing is the failure of many counties to embrace concurrent planning. Recent federal and state law mandates the practice of concurrent planning. Concurrent planning is the heart and sole of PL105-89. Concurrent planning enables social workers to consider re-unification and termination of parental rights simultaneously. It facilitates faster case resolution by setting tighter time frames for the birth families and workers to specify goals and responsibilities at the onset of the child’s out-of- home care. It can help children avoid finding themselves on a one-way linear path that does not lead back home or to adoption. The law is over two years old (November 1997) and has not really been implemented in Orange County. 20 In a Strategic Plan Update issued in March 2000 by the Social Services Agency, the following information was provided: SSA recently implemented a concurrent planning pilot project. Full implementation of concurrent planning is expected in June 2000. Another detriment to the success of timely adoptions is that of not requesting termination of parental rights until an adoptive family is in place. It is clear that there is much work ahead in Orange County to ensure safe, timely permanence for our foster children.
Commendations 1
-
CM1· The Children and Family Services, Director and Deputy Directors for their dedication, knowledge and professional assistance given to over 5,000 children each year. A special commendation for their patience and empathy shown to the Grand Jury. The 1999–2000 Orange County Grand Jury wrote five reports involving the Social Services Agency Children and Family Services Department and received outstanding contributions and cooperation. 25 · The Social Services Agency Adoption Unit and the many dedicated social workers who perform so well in a difficult and emotional milieu. · The Kinship Center which has been an important and effective partner of the Orange County Social Services Agency Children and Family Services. Kinship Center provides child placement, education, post-adoptive services, and counseling from adoption experts. Kinship Center has earned the reputation as one of the premier adoption agencies in the nation. · Sharon Kaplan Roszia, Orange County Program Manager of Kinship Center. Sharon is nationally renown and respected in the adoption program. · Olive Crest, a private group facility collaborating with the Social Services Agency. Olive Crest cares for over 450 special needs children from the ages from birth to 18+ years. Olive Crest cares for 350 children in foster homes. At the present time, Olive Crest has 1,200 children in their system and 800 families. Olive Crest also is a dedicated adoption agency. In 1999, twenty children were adopted through Olive Crest. Presently, there are over 100 adoptions pending through Olive Crest. · The social workers on the front line, police officers who deal in difficult and dangerous situations, judges who have to make very difficult determinations, both birth and adoptive parents, and foster parents and the children of adoptive families for welcoming new brothers and sisters into their homes. · The following private adoption agencies and caretaker home-study providers for their collaborative efforts with the Orange County Social Services Agency: Holy Family Services, Institute for Black Parenting, Vista Del Mar, Family Connections, Latino Family Institute, Catholic Charities, Independent Adoption Center, International Foster Family and Adoption Agency, and International Christian Adoptions. · A special commendation to Jim Palmer, President of the Orange County Rescue Mission and the House of Hope. Jim has worked diligently to increase opportunities for the homeless of Orange County to receive medical, mental health, substance abuse, employment training, life skills training, transportation and other vital services that assist individuals and families to improve the quality of their lives, live more independently and become self-sufficient. Jim leads by example as he and his wife have adopted three children through the County’s adoption agency. 26 APPENDIX A NEW U.S. POSTAL STAMP HONORS, ENCOURAGES ADOPTION Each year more than 100,000 children are adopted in the United States. To highlight this, the Postal Service has made the 33-cent adoption stamp its social issues commemorative stamp for 2000. Postmaster General William Henderson said in a statement, “This stamp will serve as a simple thank-you to everyone involved in making homes for children who are less fortunate, and it will help raise awareness about how adoption can make a positive difference in the lives of so many.” The stamp, featuring smiling boy and girl stick-figure kids holding adult “hands” was released May 10. Fundamental shapes, simple forms and bright colors depict the fragile and hopeful aspects of childhood. The text framing the art reads: “Adopting a CHILD, Sharing a LIFE, Building a HOME, Creating a WORLD.” 27 APPENDIX B Adoption Procedures and Terminology A Brief Overview Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) A system for collecting data on children in foster care and children who have been adopted under the auspices of the State child welfare agency. State child welfare agencies are responsible for reporting case management information to the federal system. Data are gathered for semi-annual report periods. The first report period covers October 1st to March 31st. The second report period is April 1st to September 30th.