📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Lake County Grand Jury
• 2018-2019
Public Safety-the First Responsibility of Local Government
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 11 findings
F1
Page 72
Public safety is a State of California Constitutional mandate.
F2
Page 72
The combined average vacancy rate among the Sheriff’s deputies, correctional officers, and dispatchers is currently 36%. [See, Exhibit 1] 2018-2019 Lake County, California Civil Grand Jury Final Report 71
F3
Page 73
Inadequate numbers of patrol officers place the safety of Lake County residents and visitors – and the officers themselves - at-risk.
F4
Page 73
The Sheriff’s Office has been losing employees in large part due to the County’s non-competitive salary and health insurance costs.
F5
Page 73
In December, 2018, the Board of Supervisors increased its maximum monthly contribution for insurance coverage for deputies in the Union from $800 to $1,000. [The Board is able to negotiate with the DSA separately.]
F6
Page 73
The Sheriff has requested restructuring of ranks within management in Dispatch and the Jail, which was approved “in theory” by the Board of Supervisors, but was not funded.
F7
Page 73
Short-staffing in the Jail and Patrol divisions results in substantial overtime costs that can impact the General Fund when grant funds are inapplicable.
F8
Page 73
The lack of available patrol officers leads to community insecurity and decreased trust of the reliability of the Sheriff’s Office by the residents they are entrusted to protect.
F9
Page 73
Communities in Lake County that feel unsafe believe that they need to mobilize citizen patrols. Although the actions of these groups are not monitored by the Sheriff’s Office, fallout from any resulting injurious events may well result in lawsuits against the County, as well as against the involved community members.
F10
Page 73
In May, 2019, the BOS agreed to an 80/20 split for deputies’ healthcare costs through its commendable approval of the MOU with the DSA, effective through the end of this year. The terms of the agreement immediately produced the desired effect, in that one deputy decided not to leave and another deputy decided to return.
F11
Page 73
The Sheriff currently has no arson investigator. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommendations 7
-
R1Page 73The Board should prioritize adequate staffing levels in the Sheriff’s Office as a California Constitutional mandate by making changes requested by the Sheriff that will assist in retention and recruitment. [F-1 through F10]
-
R2Page 73The Board should fund the Sheriff’s requested restructuring of management staff in Dispatch and the Jail. [F-6]
-
R3Page 73The Board should consider instituting a relocation allowance for sworn officers as it has for other hard-to-fill positions. [F-2, F-3, F-4]
-
R4Page 73The Board should continue the negotiated MOU terms for the Sheriff’s deputies after the current MOU expires. [F-4, F-5, F-8, F-10] 2018-2019 Lake County, California Civil Grand Jury Final Report 72
-
R5Page 74The Board should consider front-loading the 12-step salary increases for deputies while retaining the cap. [F-2, F-3, F-7]
-
R6Page 74The Sheriff must continue to educate the Citizen’s Patrols that are sprouting up in underserved communities about what they can and cannot legally do. [F-9]
-
R7Page 74The Sheriff should attempt to fill the arson investigator position. [F-11] REQUESTED RESPONSES: Board of Supervisors – 90 days [R-1 through R-5] Sheriff – 60 days [R-6] [The Grand Jury would like to thank and applaud the Sheriff and his staff, deputies, and correctional officers for their professionalism in the face of continuing fiscal hardships, as well as the BOS for their recognition of the problems and support for the MOU.] REFERENCES A crisis facing law enforcement: recruiting in the 21st century. http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/a-crisis-facing-law-enforcement-recruiting-in- the-21st-century/ California Constitution, Article XIII, Section 35. https://law.justia.com/constitution/california/article_13.html Calling 9-1-1 in rural California? Danger might be close, but the law can be hours away. https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/article230045209.html Crime and policing in rural and small-town America: an overview of the issues. National Institute of Justice. [The grand jury purchased the full report through: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=154354] How a theory of crime and policing was born and went terribly wrong. https://www.npr.org/2016/11/01/500104506/broken-windows-policing-and-the- origins-of-stop-and-frisk-and-how-it-went-wrong ‘It’s not the good old west’ - a deputy is ambushed, guilt takes down the sheriff. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article217543650.html Police shortage: many law enforcement agencies struggling to attract recruits. https://www.idahostatejournal.com/news/local/police-shortage-many-law- enforcement-agencies-struggling-to-attract-recruits/article_0f242995-a45f-58e1-b95d- 4a9bf3f8e8b9.html 2018-2019 Lake County, California Civil Grand Jury Final Report 73