📋

Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Glenn County Grand Jury • 2011-2012

Status of Past Recommendations Glenn County Grand Jury

60 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F35, F36, F37, F38, F39, F40, F41, F42, F43, F44, F45, F46, F47, F48, F49, F50, F51, F52, F53, F54, F55, F56, F57, F58, F59, F60, F61, F62, F63, F64, F65, F66, F67, F68, F69, F70, F71, F72, F73, F74, F75, F76, F77, F78, F79, F80

Findings 7 findings

Most departments and agencies were actively attempting to implement the prescribed rec- ommendations.

Some recommendations cannot be implemented due to lack of funding.

Some are still "works in progress". CONCLUSIONS IV. The Grand Jury is pleased that all county entities took seriously the recommendations of past Grand Juries. V.

Random drug testing is performed.

Promotional testing III. Findings

Promotional testing: Testing is done through the California State Merit System. The agency is to hire from the top five scores, or to show a reason for why they did not use the top five lists. Conclusions IV. While progress is slowly being made in the HRA department, many management improvements are still needed. New Recommendations V.

F81

failure or refusal to issue an Agreement, or to enter into an Agreement allowing the attendance, to the county board of education having jurisdiction over the district of residence of the parent or legal guardian or person having legal custody. Failure to appeal within the required time is good cause for denial of an appeal, 68 BP 5117(c)

Recommendations 12

R1

Orland Police Department is under staffed
R2

Look into contract hiring to reduce overtime costs.
R3

Air Conditioning Unit
R4

Safety Cell Surveillance Camera
R5

Promotional testing III. Findings
R6

Computer III. Findings The Jail works under conditions of severe underfunding.
R7

Revocation of an inter-district attendance permit may not be appealed to the County Board of Education. B. Procedures for Filing an Appeal
R8

The administrative decision of the Board shall be final, and no reconsideration or rehearing by the Board shall be permitted.
R9

In the notification or the administrative decision, the parties shall be advised that, should either party desire to seek a judicial review of the county board's administrative decision, that such judicial review must be requested within ninety (90) calcadar days of the date of the Board's determination. cf. BP 5119(a), 9320(a), 9321(a), 9321.1(a), 9323(a) Legal Reference; Education Code sections 46600, 46601, 46602, 48350 et. Seg., Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6; CA Alty, Ceneral Opinion No 96-908 01/10/12 5 . . . ķ. 60
R10

district of residence To provide a change in school environment for reasons of personal and social
R11

adjustment 62 C S DOL AR 5117(b) INTERDISTRICT ATTENDANCE (continued) An interdistrict attendance permit shall not exceed a term of five years. Each permit shall stipulate the terms and conditions established by both districts under which interdistrict attendance shall be permitted, denied, or revoked, and any standards for reapplication. (Education Code 46600) Once a student is enrolled in the district school, he/she shall not be required to reapply for an interdistrict transfer and shall be allowed to continue to attend the school unless reapplication standards are otherwise specified in the permit. Existing interdistrict attendance permits shall not be reseinded for students entering grade 11 or 12 in the subsequent school year. (Education Code 46600) The Superintendent/Principal or designee may deny initial requests for interdistrict attendance permits if school facilities are overcrowded at the relevant grade level or based on other considerations that are not arbitrary. However, once a student is admitted, the district may not deny him/her continued attendance because of overcrowded facilities at the relevant grade level. of a request for an interdistrict permit, the Superintendent/Principal or designee shall notify the parents/guardians of a student who is denied interdistrict attendance regarding the process for appeal to the County Board of Education as specified in Education Code 46601. (Education Code 46601) (cf. 5143.6 - Parental Notifications) Students who are under consideration for expulsion or who have been expelled may not appeal interdistrict attendance denials or decisions while expulsion proceedings are pending or during the term of the expulsion. (Education Code 46601) (of 5119 - Students Expelled from Other Districts) (cf. 5144.1 - Suspension and Expulsion/Due Process) PLAZA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Regulation Orland, California approved: September 21, 2011 BP 5119(a) 63
R81

failure or refusal to issue an Agreement, or to enter into an Agreement allowing the attendance, to the county board of education having jurisdiction over the district of residence of the parent or legal guardian or person having legal custody. Failure to appeal within the required time is good cause for denial of an appeal, 68 BP 5117(c)