📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Glenn County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
Status of Past Recommendation I. Purpose To review past responses from former Grand Jury investigations to determine if
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
Most departments and agencies were actively attempting to implement the prescribed rec- ommendations.
F2
Some recommendations cannot be implemented due to lack of funding.
F3
Some are still “works in progress”. IV. CONCLUSIONS The Grand Jury is pleased that all county entities took seriously the recommendations of past Grand Juries. V.
F4
Random drug testing is performed.
F5
Promotional testing III. Findings
F6
Promotional testing: Testing is done through the California State Merit System. The agency is to hire from the top five scores, or to show a reason for why they did not use the top five lists. IV. Conclusions While progress is slowly being made in the HRA department, many management improvements are still needed. V. New Recommendations
Recommendations 6
-
R1Page 38Most departments and agencies were actively attempting to implement the prescribed rec- ommendations.
-
R2Page 38Some recommendations cannot be implemented due to lack of funding.
-
R3Page 38Some are still “works in progress”. IV.
-
R4Page 44Random drug testing is performed.
-
R5Page 44Promotional testing III. Findings
-
R6Page 39Computer III. Findings