📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Mendocino County Grand Jury • 1999-2000

Potter Valley Irrigation District

4 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1 Page 193
A conflict of by-laws Section 9 and 16 existed. Section 9 states; "All complaints must be filed within five (5) days upon receipt of bill, or water delivery." Section 16 states; "All complaints must be filed within ten (10) days upon receipt of bill, or water delivery." Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): The 2000 Final Draft of the District By-Laws was reviewed by the Board of Directors at the June 21st Regular Meeting. The Bylaws were edited and reworked to eliminate the conflict of ByLaws that existed in the old version in use at this time. Also the statement in By-Law Section 16 regarding a customer losing the right to complain was deleted. The final Draft was approved to go to an attorney for review of the terminology and legality of the rules contained in the new District By- Law document. When returned the District By-Laws will be sent out to every customer of the Potter Valley Irrigation District.
F2 Page 193
By-law Section 16, also states, "A customer loses his/her right to complain after ten days." 1999-2000 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 193 Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): Customers were contacted and preferred that the Water Bills be sent at the end of the water season as in the past. However, when the updated By-Laws are sent out to the District customers, they will be notified that the District will provide them a up to date water bill at any time of the water season upon request.
F3 Page 194
No written receipts are given to customers upon delivery of water. Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): At the July 19th regular meeting, on a motion by Dir. Bob Hess, seconded by Dir. Oberfeld, the Board approved taping all future Board meetings and retaining the tapes for one year. Supt. Elliott was authorized to purchase a tape recorder for this purpose.
F4
Customers are billed annually in October. Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): Supt. Elliott has set up an on-going training program for all employees scheduled for the 1st Monday of each month at which the water tender record keeping as well as other aspects of the water tenders’ job will be reviewed, and signed off by the employees present.
F5 Page 194
The Secretary/Treasurer is currently filling the position of acting Tax Collector. Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): Willits Attorney, Christopher Neary, was scheduled to meet with the Board at the July 19”’ meeting but was unable to attend. He is interested in serving as the legal counsel for the Potter Valley Irrigation District on an on-call basis. He is scheduled to be at the August 16th meeting to meet the Board of Directors to discuss the position.
F6 Page 194
It was determined after interview of board members, that nepotism no longer exists within the PVID. 194 1999-2000 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Response (Potter Valley Irrigation District): The Board of Directors will give serious consideration to increasing the Superintendent’s salary in January 2001 when the District Budget is set up for the year and the District Salary Schedule is established.
F7 Page 195
District record keeping was sloppy, and for some customers the water rates were incorrect.
F8 Page 195
Sloppy handwritten record keeping and financial bookkeeping data have been upgraded from handwritten to computer record keeping.
F9 Page 195
The Superintendent's salary was not commensurate with occupations in Potter Valley, with the same or lesser responsibilities.

Recommendations 4