Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Digging Deeper - Board of Supervisors Oversight of Planning & Building

Published: June 24, 2026 71 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 14 findings

F1
The BOS action taken by approving the response to the Grand Jury GJ25Report was a contravention to its Mission Statement and the Principles of Office.
F2
The lack of direction and unclear communication from the BOS to the CEO to manage, supervise, and maintain accountability in the daily operations within PBS has compromised public safety and best business practices.
F3
The BOS has not issued directives that would compel PBS’ full compliance with all State laws and County ordinances by creating current and comprehensive policies and procedures.
F4
There remains a critical need for the BOS to provide direction to create, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures ensuring equitable services to the residents of Mendocino County.
F5
In most divisions in PBS, policies and procedures that exist are not comprehensive and are unclear. of 18
F6
PBS staff are dedicated, hardworking individuals who desire a positive outcome for the public.
F7
The Cannabis Division’s clear policies, procedures, and expectations for personnel that have been created for this division are exactly what is needed for the entire department and should be the standard for the other divisions within PBS.
F8
Lack of policies and procedures has resulted in the PBS adapting to a pattern of practice dependent on individual employees’ institutional knowledge and discretion.
F9
Procedures that are incomplete, misnumbered, and have no style guidelines or retention logs, compel employees to rely on individual discretion and institutional knowledge.
F10
The safety of Mendocino County residents and their properties is left to the discretion of PBS employees due to inadequate implementation of PRC section 4290/Title 14.
F11
Building Division’s documentation reveals incomplete, poorly maintained, and sporadic contradictory directions to its employees.
F12
PBS continues to misinterpret the term “pre-existing” for illegally constructed residential and commercial structures which, as implemented by the County, circumvents the requirements of PRC section 4290/Title 14.
F13
The County’s inconsistencies in enforcing PRC section 4290/Title 14 enable an environment for favoritism, opportunity for bias, and continued failure to assure implementation of minimum wildfire protection standards. .
F14
The BOS has failed to ensure compliance with PRC section 4290/Title 14 and to ensure implementation of comprehensive policies and procedures throughout PBS.

Recommendations 7