📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 1995-1996

Juvenile Services Committee

View PDF View Full Original

Findings 2 findings

F1
A WIC 241.1 protocol assessment is made on The true identity of the juvenile is not too few juveniles within the DCFS. always known. It is not unusual for juveniles to move from county to county and to have cases The DCFS is initiating an audit on the pending in various counties simultaneously. The 241.1 protocol, investigating who is initiating files would be more complete if all juveniles the referral and whether the assessments are who are arrested were fingerprinted and the accomplished in a timely manner. record maintained statewide. The Inter-Agency Council expects that by July 1, 1996 the index would include the
F2
Inter-Agency communication. departments of Health Services, Mental Health, Probation, District Attorney, Coroner, and the Los Angeles Police. When the system is County and city agencies in February completed there will be 28 participating 1996, began using the new centralized $400,000 agencies. Some will be at city, county, state, computer index to share information between and/or federal levels. agencies involved in the Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect (ICAN), namely, Case studies in the Audit Report for this the Sheriff, Public Social Services, and Children Committee consistently pointed out the problem and Family Services. is not in procedures but the lack of communication between agencies serving the children of Los Angeles County. . . -- 3 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 and the second of the second of the second . . PART II. CLASSIFICATION OF DEPENDENT CHILDREN under the definition of WIC 601, and, due to funding,

Recommendations 5