San Francisco County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

A Report of the 2002-2003 Civil Grand Jury For the City and County of San Francisco It’s a Catastrophe:

Published: June 19, 2003 33 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
Helicopters are essential to adequate disaster response.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Mayor and the Director of Emergency Services should create an integrated and comprehensive structure for emergency planning, assure inter-agency communications, and provide emergency training on an ongoing basis. The Mayor should participate in the planning and communications of Emergency Services, and communicate to all city departments the high priority it holds in his or her administration.
F2
Coordinated and comprehensive emergency planning has not occurred on a continuing basis. An unofficial group of department heads, the Kawa-Harrington group, has come into existence to fill the resulting void. 7
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Mayor should reconvene the Disaster Council, which has not met since October 2001, and it should review and approve departmental emergency plans.
F3
Involvement of department heads and elected officers in emergency planning through the Disaster Council is necessary if City departments are to assume responsibility and devote the departmental time, resources, and personnel necessary to train for and carry out the response activities called for in the integrated City emergency plan. Their involvement is also essential if they are to recognize the need to prepare and maintain their own departmental response plans on an ongoing basis. This goal cannot be achieved if the Disaster Council does not meet regularly, if the members of the Council do not represent all key personnel involved emergency response, or if neither the City emergency plan nor department plans are reviewed and updated continuously.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
All City departments involved in emergency response should adopt the Incident Command System.
F4
Members of the Board of Supervisors may be required to perform significant executive as well as legislative functions in an emergency including serving as Mayor/Commander in Chief; concurring in the declaration of emergency and the actions taken to meet it; amending a declaration of emergency as long as the emergency exists; taking away emergency powers; reviewing the Emergency Declaration every 14 days, and, finally terminating the Emergency Declaration. The Director of Emergency Services has not ensured that members of the Board understand these emergency responsibilities.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
City departments should conduct annual multi-agency disaster response simulations.
F5
The Director of Emergency Services has failed to meet the regulatory responsibilities imposed by Sections 7.6.l and 7.9 of the San Francisco Administrative Code to develop and maintain an integrated emergency plan that is continuously reviewed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Director of Emergency Services should annually test recall process that is intended to enable employees of first responder departments to successfully return to San Francisco in an emergency.
F6
All city officials who may assume leadership in a major emergency must be informed of and understand the emergency procedures. Without proper preparation, members of the Board of Supervisors could inadvertently communicate erroneous information to residents or to providers of emergency resources. The failure to ensure that members of the Board receive training and are fully knowledgeable about emergency response plans could have serious negative consequences leading to chaos and disorganization rather than the effective leadership needed most during a major disaster. If the leaders in a city emergency are not knowledgeable about and comply with State mutual aid requirements, the City may not be eligible to receive mutual aid or reimbursement from State and Federal governments for response-related costs under disaster assistance programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Mayor’s Office should improve the security of City facilities and assets, and institute proper evacuation plans for all City facilities.
F7
The Mayor through the Director of Emergency Services and the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Services is responsible for ensuring that members of the Board of Supervisors and all City officials with emergency response duties receive adequate training for and understand those duties. The Mayor has not fulfilled this responsibility.
Related Recommendations (2)
R7
As detailed in this report, the City should address the inadequacy of its emergency resources in the following specific areas: communications and technology; shelter, blankets, cots, and food; hazardous materials suits; and helicopters.
R7r
San Francisco should analyze the costs and benefits of securing one or more helicopters and develop a specific proposal for helicopter services, including funding alternatives.
F8
If radio and telephone communications fail in a disaster, HAM radios may be the only mode of communication available.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The City should improve its methods of budgeting for emergency response.