Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2000-2001
Riverside County Department of Mental Health Patients’ Rights Advocacy Program
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
The first Patients’ Rights Advocate was appointed in 1980. The current staff in the Patients’ Rights Department includes a Chief Patients’ Rights Advocate, three regular advocates, a Licensed Vocational Nurse II (LVN II), and an Office Assistant III (OA III).
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The population of Riverside County was 1,522,855 on January 1, 2000. The 1986 State Department of Mental Health Task Force recommended a staffing ratio of 1/300,000 in the Patients’ Rights Advocates office. The current ratio is 1/500,000.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Immediately provide the funds necessary to increase the number of Patients’ Rights Advocates by a minimum of two to meet the standard of 1/300,000 population as recommended by the Department of Mental Health Task Force.
F3
The Chief Patients’ Rights Advocate’s primary responsibilities are “... to plan, organize, coordinate, direct, and supervise the Administrative aspects of the Patients’ Rights Program” (Job Description of the Chief Patients’ Rights Advocate, 6/98). The Chief Advocate is currently carrying regular advocate responsibilities and spending limited time on administrative functions.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Utilize the Chief Patients’ Rights Advocate in oversight and administrative functions as opposed to routine advocate duties.
F4
In February 2000, the Patients’ Rights Office was assigned the additional responsibility of attending and monitoring Riese Hearings that were formerly handled by the County Public Defenders Office. No additional staff was allocated for this purpose. Riese Hearings for a client must be held within 24 hours after filing. The Patients’ Rights Program receives a one-day notice of the hearing, which requires three hours preparation time in addition to the 15 to 60 minutes court time. If these hearings are scheduled in outlying courts, additional time is required for travel. Scheduling is difficult and on occasion a patient does not receive the required representation of the Patients’ Rights Advocate. Of the last three Riese Hearings held in Indio, the advocate was only able to represent two. In the last 12 months, an advocate represented all 80 clients in Riverside. 2
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Three facilities are designated to receive, evaluate, and assess an individual who is on a 72-hour hold for acute care and treatment. They are the Oasis Mental Health Center in Indio, Desert Regional Medical Center in Palm Springs, and the Riverside County Regional Medical Center (RCRMC) in Moreno Valley. The RCRMC has an additional site, the Emergency Treatment Services in Riverside. The Patients’ Rights Offices are adjacent to the Emergency Treatment Services. There are also 40 licensed community care facilities that the Patients’ Rights Department oversees.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The current office space for the Patients’ Rights Department is inadequate Each office houses two personnel necessitating one advocate to go to another location when a client is being interviewed. They are to move on or about June 15, 2001, to a facility with cubicles and a conference room for their interviews. An office will be retained at their present location for needed on- site work. The negative issues of inadequate space and privacy will remain, with the additional problem of staffing two locations.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
The California Welfare and Institutions Code 5520-b mandates a yearly review of Patients’ Rights Programs by an advocate at all mental health facilities. These Patients’ Rights Programs have not been reviewed for four years.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Advocates have been unable to maintain patients’ rights group meetings and special discussions in mental health facilities due to lack of time and personnel.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Mandated (Welfare and Institutions Code 5520-c) in-service education for the staff at mental health facilities was discontinued in February 2000 due to insufficient staff.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The File Maker Pro software has been installed in two computers but has not been programmed to meet the information and tracking needs of the department. An additional computer allocated to the department has not yet been delivered.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Provide for programming of the File Maker Pro software, training in the use of this software, and delivery of the computer allocated to the department immediately following their relocation.
F11
In 1994, the Office of Patients’ Rights Protection and Advocacy, Inc. conducted a Program Review of the Riverside County Patients’ Rights Program and found the previously recommended staff ratio remains unmet. 3
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
Immediately provide the funds necessary to increase the number of Patients’ Rights Advocates by a minimum of two to meet the standard of 1/300,000 population as recommended by the Department of Mental Health Task Force.
R4
Contract for an updated study by the Patients’ Rights Protection and Advocacy, Inc. for a review of the current Patients’ Rights Program. 4