⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
Recommendations 6
-
R1Emphasis should be on tourist-type business (small shops), with historical theme. Only retail stores should be located on ground floors of downtown buildings. Large retail store buildings should not be sacrificed for government uses. Response: The City appreciates the Grand Jury's concerns for the well being of the City. However, another layer of regulations, as suggested by the report, may not be the answer to promoting economic revitalization of the community. The real estate market dictates business location behavior. The best thing the City could do would be to create tools, which would help business owner's plan for the future.
-
R2Legislation may be necessary to give an incentive to bring buildings up to code. Examples include: tax incentives and a longer period of time to bring buildings up to code when buildings are sold. Punitive recourse should be sought, if no effort is made to preserve buildings. Response: City regulation is generally not an effective method to induce building revitalization. Tools, such as the Downtown Strategic Plan, can help energize the community and therefore, the real estate market, which will improve building renovation. However, the City is currently developing a revised nuisance abatement ordinance that will incorporate a financial penalty for building code violations. These fines accumulate and will provide owners with an incentive to renovate or sell. If not paid, the fines will become a lien on the property. The revised ordinance should help improve the City's code enforcement process.
-
R3A historic theme needs to be developed and adhered to throughout the downtown area. City Administrators should have meetings with all segments of City employees to develop programs and ensure that City staff will work from the shared vision. The City is currently preparing a Downtown Strategic Plan with the assistance of a professional planning consultant. The plan is expected to be completed over the next six months. The purpose of the plan is to develop a vision of the needs of the downtown with emphasis on economic development and historical preservation/enhancement. The plan will include a visioning process, which will engage the public and the downtown merchant association in creating a plan for the economic prosperity of the town with a historical theme. The plan will incorporate an economic analysis that will provide direction as to what retail businesses the City should target for success and include a design element to assure future in-fill development is compatible and consistent with a historical theme. The plan will define what regulations should be established which might include emphasis on "tourist-type business (small shops)" and "government uses." The plan will include a detailed Implementation Plan with specific actions, time lines and funding measures to assure the downtown is developed in accordance with the community vision. While the City appreciates the Grand Jury's recommendations, the City finds that it is appropriate to research and develop a coordinated plan with the stakeholders and public before determining what is best for the community.
-
R4Short-term solution of the downtown parking "shortage" is using vacant lots. Storeowners should be encouraged to use off-street parking. Businesses that have parking lots should be encouraged to allow their use after hours. Multi-level parking grants should be pursued in the long-term. Response: The City is currently preparing a Downtown Parking Study, which will consider the short-term and long-term solutions to downtown parking. The study will evaluate whether there is a parking shortage or perceived parking shortage and provide a plan for the ultimate development of parking over the eventual in-fill of development in the downtown. The study will include recommendations on methods to address parking conflicts between business employees, residents and shoppers. The study will include a detailed Implementation Plan with specific actions, time lines and funding measures to assure parking is developed according to a community vision. The study will be coordinated with the Downtown Strategic Plan, so that the two planning tools will assure consistent development with growth of the community. The City appreciates the Grand Jury's concerns for the well being of the City. Perhaps a "Multi-level Parking Grant" as noted in the report, will be one of many parking solutions for the downtown. However, multi-level parking is extremely expensive.
-
R5Marysville should address the future by aggressively pursuing a plan to annex. Marysville should promote the building of taller buildings. If the City does not address and plan for the future of growth in the area, it may not be reasonable to keep the City as the County seat. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Response: The City's General Plan identifies the community area expanding to the north to include additional urban development. The City's Downtown Strategic Plan will include strategies for more intense urbanization, which should include promoting construction of taller buildings. Although the City appreciates the Grand Jury's suggestion of pursuing aggressive annexation and more intensive urbanization, there may be a contradiction in seeking annexation that can often lead to urban sprawl, while also encouraging in-fill and redevelopment to enhance the City. On the other hand, the City perceives a lack of "big picture" planning by Yuba County with the large number of housing projects that have been approved and are being developed outside the City's boundaries which will result in tremendous impacts such as traffic and air pollution to the City. Perhaps Yuba County and the City should better coordinate future development in the region. SACOG has developed a "Blue Print" Workshop Series to consider regional growth consequences and is encouraging the City and the County to develop "Smart Growth" planning principals, with preference to in-fill development and greater urban development intensities over urban sprawl. SACOG has used the City of Marysville as a model city for Smart Growth due to the downtown pedestrian circulation features. The City is encouraging SACOG to assist the City and the County to develop a regional Smart Growth Plan. Perhaps the form it will eventually take is a combined General Plan Update for both jurisdictions, which would create a coordinated growth plan for the area.
-
R6Marysville's Business Improvement District should market itself as competition to malls. Marysville businesses should be encouraged to stay open until 9:00 p.m. at least twice a week. Businesses should take an active part in festivals, as currently, many stay closed. Revitalization of Marysville will never be successful with government action alone! Response: As previously noted, the Downtown Strategic Plan and Downtown Parking Study will help focus a realistic vision of community development for the downtown. With the help of the two studies, the City and the Downtown Merchants Association will be able to develop a marketing plan, which may indeed improve competition to shopping malls. The City Council wishes to thank the Grand Jury for its recommendations. Sincerely, Selle Dirk Helder Mayor OLIVEHURST PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT * * * BOARD OF DIRECTORS PO. Box 670 James Carpenter 1970 9th Avenue Richard Donahue Olivehurst, CA 95961 Philip R. Miller Telephone (530) 743-0317 Larry D. Patty Fax (530) 743-3023 Manny Souza OCT 2 2 2003 GENERAL MANAGER Gary C. Plasterer H. STEPHEN KONISHI October 3, 2003 SUPERIOR COURT CLERK BY Evelyn Allis Deputy Court Executive Officer Superior Court of California County of Yuba 215 5th Street Marysville, CA 95901 and the second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second seco Dear Ms. Allis: The light's 100 to 2000 to build become a company to the larger than the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contr The Olivehurst Public Utility District provides water, sewer, parks, recreation, fire, and other services to the unincorporated community of Olivehurst. The District also provides water, sewer, parks, and recreation in the Plumas Lake Specific Plan Area. Linda County Fire District provides fire and rescue service in the area. Recently, the District Board of Directors and citizens of Olivehurst have been meeting to discuss the possibility of incorporation of the community of Olivehurst and all other land within the District boundaries. A consultant has been retained to evaluate the financial feasibility of incorporation. The objective of the incorporation of a new city called Olivehurst would be to provide full service to the citizens of the city and to have them control their own destiny. The discussions have been very preliminary, but the focus has been to provide all services that a city is authorized to provide, such as police, fire, planning, building, and of course water, sewer, parks, and recreation. By Add For I April 1997 It is apparent that the tax revenue base is not adequate at this time, but within the near future with the growth of the Plumas Lake Specific Plan Area there is a strong possibility that incorporation of the Olivehurst community could be a successful viable city. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E. Allis Yuba County Superior court . . . . . . . . . . . the first of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of the second of ....................................... All the second of the second of the . . FILED YUBA COUNTYSUPERIOR COURT Superior Court of California County of Yuba Yuba County Courthouse 2003 OCT 28 PM 2: 30 215 Fifth Street Marysville, Ca. 95901 H. STEPHEN KONISHI CLERK OF THE COURT Attention: Evelyn Allis, Deputy Court Executive Officer BY_ CLERK Re: 2002/2003 Grand Jury Final Report Response I'm sorry, I did not understand that I was suppose to respond but all the recommendations have been done. 1. With the help of County Council new rules, regulations, and by-laws were adopted at a cemetery meeting on August 3, 2003. 2. The cemetery Board of Directors agree to react to maintenance problems in a more timely manner. 3. Cemetery meetings are now posted in three locations in the district with all pertinent information about the meeting listed. This is posted at least six days before the meeting. Also, an agenda is posted in the same locations three days before a meeting. Sincerely, Shannon Hunt, Societary Shannon Hunt, Secretary Peoria Cemetery District .
Comments 1
-
CO1Yuba City $113 90 Grass Valley Nevada City None Chico Only for expired/no registration 55 Oroville 13 67 Sacramento The above list reflects that the average release fee for area municipalities is $56.33. The committee noticed that Yuba City and Maryville have the two highest release fees in the municipalities sampled.
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.