📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Amador County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
Amador County LAFCO/ Municipal Services Review
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F1
Page 17
The Public Conservator’s Office has reorganized and changed procedures to protect Clients and their estates.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 17
The Public Conservator’s Office is responsible for a fast growing elderly population in Amador County.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 17
The staff is stretched thin with daily operations and cases. However, the staff is still required to clean up old cases so funds can be distributed to the rightful heirs of deceased Clients.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 17
The Deputy Public Conservator/Guardians and Chief Public Administrator/Conservator /Guardian travels to Clients’ homes or facilities (some Clients are placed outside of Amador County due to lack of sufficient facilities within the County). The Conservator’s Office also monitors Clients in their homes and takes them to appointments. The Conservator’s office has one non-four wheel drive van for the entire office.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 17
The Conservator’s Office building is not adequate. Some of the staff members share very small offices.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 17
The elderly population in Amador County is increasing, and as a result the Conservator’s Office personnel are overextended.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Page 17
The accounting procedures in place are adequate, but with the limited staffing, some procedures are not completed in a timely manner.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 17
The Conservator’s Office staff has mandated training to maintain their certification every year, but no training funds have been allocated in their yearly budget.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Page 17
The Conservator’s Office has a new computer system, but the staff has not been adequately trained to use it.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 17
After touring a Client’s home, it appeared that Client was well cared for and happy.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Page 17
All revenue generated by the Conservator’s Office goes into the County General Fund.
No recommendations for this finding