📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

San Benito County Grand Jury • 2025-2026

Transparency Issues at Sunnyslope County Water District

Published: June 03, 2026 21 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 8 findings

F1
Sewer rates were changed without the public noƟce required under ProposiƟon 218.
F2
The easement acquisiƟon process appears inconsistent and may not fully align with established procedures.
F3
The decision by the Sunnyslope Board to bypass the established steps in conflict resoluƟon contributed to addiƟonal conflict among Board members and the airing of grievances in the public forum.
F4
CommunicaƟon and transparency issues are significantly affecƟng interacƟons among Sunnyslope management, staff, Board members, and the public.
F5
When the general manager is negoƟaƟng contracts, such as those for the easements and the contract with the City of Hollister, the Board is not receiving all of the perƟnent details.
F6
When Sunnyslope creates a recording of a Board meeƟng, it becomes a public record, subject to CPRA and the Brown Act. Sunnyslope currently records Board meeƟngs; however, the existence and availability of these recordings are not clearly communicated to the Board or the public.
F7
Sunnyslope accepted an outside rate study that did not include methodology templates from the contractor, which hindered their ability to fully analyze the recommendaƟons within the report.
F8
Current hiring pracƟces for management posiƟons are creaƟng confusion within the District.

Recommendations 17