📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

El Dorado County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

Georgetown Divide Public Utility District, Accounting Practices

3 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 24
The Consultant performed audits for GDPUD from 1981 through 1995 in addition to certain accounting functions with GDPUD management knowledge and approval.
F2 Page 24
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) do not allow a self-audit. Government Auditing Standards (Yellow 5 Book) do allow self-audits under certain conditions. The Yellow Book was revised in January 2003 to disallow a self-audit and any appearance of same.
F3 Page 25
It appears no Management Representation Letter was presented to the auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2000.
F4 Page 25
The General Manager signed a Management Representation Letter for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002 covering a period of time prior to his employment.
F5 Page 25
The Consultant did not have a written contract for accounting services until 2001. There were Letters of Engagement only for the auditing functions signed by the General Manager.

Recommendations 4

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.