📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Butte County Grand Jury
• 2012-2013
Butte County Employment Services and Eligibility Services Division
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
Page 23
Butte County government showed support for the grand jury system with its on-time and on-point responses, even as county officials disagreed as often as not with the findings and recommendations of the 2011-12 report.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 23
The Feather River Recreation and Park District explained all of its positions in considerable detail and in conformance with state law. In contrast, three recreation and park districts - Durham, Paradise and Richvale - failed to meet their legal requirements even after a reminder letter from the 2012 - 13 Grand Jury.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 23
The two cities that were the subjects of reports, Gridley and Oroville, both agreed overwhelmingly with the 2011-12 Grand Jury’s findings and
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 23
Larger local government agencies, which commonly have more personnel and more experience dealing with grand jury reports, generally did better than smaller agencies in providing legally adequate responses to reports. xvi
No recommendations for this finding