Kern County Grand Jury • 2025-2026

Traffic Calming for the City of Bakersfield - We Should All Slow Down

Published: April 30, 2026 15 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 8 findings

F1
The City does not have a process to routinely review traffic patterns across the City, which can lead to citizens' complaints about congestion and speeding.
F2
For over 26 years, Public Works has not increased Traffic Engineering staff levels. This can cause numerous long-term problems, including long waits for new project approvals, reliance upon less-skilled positions to take up the slack, and an inability to proactively respond before citizens complain.
F3
The City may be losing trained engineers and staff to other regions and companies due to higher pay scales and/or lower workloads.
F4
The Public Works Department and BPD do not routinely meet to assess traffic concerns. This may cause conflicts of interest between the departments concerning speed enforcement, and congestion control.
F5
The many City Plans (General Plan and various Local Traffic Plans) created over the last two decades are sometimes conflicting, redundant, or no longer relevant. There is not a single website where all relevant plans can be found.
F6
The City’s website does not have a clear online pathway for citizens to file complaints about traffic-specific concerns, including reports of excessive speeding; thus, there is a reliance upon BPD traffic enforcement rather than reviewing engineering issues.
F7
The Public Works staff are dedicated employees, as demonstrated by their hard work to remain up to date regarding traffic engineering and regulations.
F8
The Public Works Department and the Traffic Division do not regularly schedule reviews of city codes regarding street transitions to collectors and/or arterials. Regularly scheduled reviews could ensure the latest traffic calming tools are applied to local streets and all new development.

Recommendations 7