Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2000-2001

Redwood Coast Fire Protection District (Point Arena Area) The Redwood Coast Fire Protection District (District) is

Published: May 01, 2001 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 13 findings

F1
The District is managed by a volunteer board, volunteer firefighters, and one salaried General Manager. Response (Redwood Coast Fire Protection District Board of Directors): The Board agrees with all findings (1 thru 13)
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Measure P, passed by voters in June 1997 with a 67.2% majority, formed the District. Only registered voters in the District were allowed to vote. Absentee property owners were not eligible to vote.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Measure P imposed a tax of up to $85 per “benefit unit.”
No recommendations for this finding
F4
At this time, property owners are taxed at $40 for each benefit unit. Benefit units are “based on the use or the right of use of each legal parcel, and to the extent practical, upon the costs of providing services associated with each parcel…” (Redwood Fire District, Ordinance No. 2000-01).
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The parcels cannot be taxed according to the property values.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The District adopted the County Assessor’s use codes for identifying benefit use. The Assessor’s codes were intended for Assessor’s office internal use only. They were never intended to calculate taxes.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
When assigning use codes, the District’s Board must adhere to the standards that were implemented by voters in Measure P.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Ordinance No. 2000-01 states: “Units of benefit, as listed herein, shall be assessed on all real property (except that of Federal, State or Government agencies) within the boundaries of the Redwood Coast Fire Protection District.”
No recommendations for this finding
F9
There are 1509 assessor’s parcels and 620 pay no tax. Therefore, about 41% of all assessor’s parcels are not taxed.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The current method of District taxation of unimproved parcels is inequitable. Property with use codes “range lands,” “timber lands,” and “dry classified lands” are not taxed, while other unimproved parcels, such as “recreation residential” are taxed $120 to $160 per year.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Any change to the method of District taxation must be passed by 2/3 of the voters.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The Board approved a proposal to the voters dated May 1, 2001, to change the method of taxation, including the following: “The basic ground rules…are: (cid:3) Parcels with a total assessed value < $1000 are not taxed. (cid:3) All vacant parcels are assessed 1 unit regardless of size or zoning. [Note: Final version of the proposal changes vacant parcels to 1/2 unit each] (cid:1) Residential dwellings, in addition to the primary use, are assessed [an additional] 1/2 unit each…”
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The Board does not have a written procedure for handling disputes regarding imposed taxes.
No recommendations for this finding

Comments 1