📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2001-2002

Retirement System

6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 28
The public and clients do not appear to understand the scope of client services offered by the Bureau of Family Support. This causes stress to bureau staff and inhibits good relations between the Bureau, its clients, and client advocacy groups.
F2 Page 28
The 10% vacancy rate of all full time equivalent staff positions in the Bureau of Family Support has a substantial negative impact on the Bureau’s operating objectives, and creates an environment in which staff feels overwhelmed and clients feel frustrated and unhappy.
F3 Page 28
Closing cases for an inability to locate non-custodial parents after two years does not allow the fullest opportunity to locate highly mobile absent parents.
F4 Page 28
The availability of a database containing the names and Social Security numbers of persons to whom probate distributions are made would aid the Bureau in locating non-custodial parents to collect child support and other obligations.

Recommendations 4