📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
Page 224
The LCSO did not comply with the LEOSA and did not give this retired deputy his ID badge.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 224
It is recommended that the Lake County Sheriff’s Office be timely in its issuance of identification cards to entitled deputies. (F1, F4) Agency/Department(s) Required to Respond: • Lake County Sheriff, 2009-2010 Lake County Civil Grand Jury
F2
Page 224
The 2007-2008 Grand Jury investigated this complaint last year and its
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 224
It is recommended that the Lake County Sheriff’s Office respond to Grand Jury requests in a timelier manner. (F2, F3)
F3
Page 224
Numerous calls from the Grand Jury to the LCSO contact person received no response.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 224
It is recommended that the Lake County Sheriff’s Office respond to Grand Jury requests in a timelier manner. (F2, F3)
F4
Page 224
The complainant was given a verbal apology in late February, 2010, by LCSO and told his identification badge was in the mail. Two and a half weeks later, it still had not arrived.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 224
It is recommended that the Lake County Sheriff’s Office be timely in its issuance of identification cards to entitled deputies. (F1, F4) Agency/Department(s) Required to Respond: • Lake County Sheriff, 2009-2010 Lake County Civil Grand Jury
F5
Page 224
The issue is now resolved to the complainant’s satisfaction.
No recommendations for this finding