📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Tulare County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
Smoke but NO Fire Tulare County Fire Department
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 7 findings
F1
The Grand Jury determined the combining of the office of city manager and police chief positions critically weakened the checks-and-balances with regards to personnel issues. This eliminated the division of authority to more than one person and position.
F2
A number of costly employee settlements resulted from the aforementioned combination of these two positions.
F3
The Grand Jury determined that the lack of meaningful evidence made allegations of Brown Act violations difficult to substantiate.
F4
Some City council members were involved in discussions over union issues at private residences and outside the parameters of established procedures.
F5
The cost of the employee settlements contributed to the city’s poor financial condition and the necessity to impose employee furloughs.
F6
The city reached high-cost employment severance settlements (in excess of $400,000) with a number of employees over the issue of termination.
F7
The city council imposed employee furloughs, claiming financial constraints. FINDINGS: F1. The Grand Jury determined the combining of the office of city manager and police chief positions critically weakened the checks-and-balances with regards to personnel issues. This eliminated the division of authority to more than one person and position. F2. A number of costly employee settlements resulted from the aforementioned combination of these two positions. F3. The Grand Jury determined that the lack of meaningful evidence made allegations of Brown Act violations difficult to substantiate. F4. Some City council members were involved in discussions over union issues at private residences and outside the parameters of established procedures. F5. The cost of the employee settlements contributed to the city’s poor financial condition and the necessity to impose employee furloughs.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Lindsay City Council members should thoroughly familiarize themselves with open meeting laws (Brown Act) and generally acceptable procedures for conducting municipal business.
-
R2The Lindsay City Council should be more deliberative when considering the combining of key managerial positions.