📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
San Benito County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
Individualized Education Program (iep)
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 1 findings
F2
Page 42
In its review of records the Grand Jury found no case of bias as a result of ethnicity, race or type of disability. F3. The IEP and associated rules have the effect of distributing over 20% of the Education department budget to 10% of the students in the district with no attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of the increased services.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 42While all the information regarding compliance was available it required several requests from different sources to obtain it. Regardless of the record keeping requirements under the various provisions the Districts should have detailed master file electronic records on each IEP student identifying critical dates and the plan requirements.
-
R2Page 42The Grand Jury found no evidence of any kind to suggest that anyone had been the subject of discrimination. This determination would be more transparent and easier to make had the Districts kept the electronic records suggested in
-
R3Page 42It was not clear from documentation provided how many students were from outside the districts and were receiving services on a pay as you go basis. It is also not clear how the children receiving these services progressed as a group or by disability. In other words does this program provide the benefits promised? Government seems consumed by process not results. The Districts should make an attempt to track the success and failure of the various recommendations.