Santa Cruz County Grand Jury
• 2012-2013
Pathways for English Learners Giving Parents the Right Information
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
The Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for English Learner progress are complex, give little indication of how long it takes English Learners to become reclassified as fluent, and do not measure the effectiveness of individual English Learner programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Even though it is not mandated by the state, in order to monitor historical trends and validate improvements made to programs, districts should consider tracking long term English Learner results by program and make the information available on district websites for review by parents, the Board of Trustees, and the community. The data should track all English Learners and follow them until they leave the district. This longitudinal data would allow the following information to be published by instructional program: ● Time to Reclassification (RFEP) ● Long term achievement levels (from STAR testing) ● Long term achievement level “gap” between English Learners, RFEPs, and English Only ● High school graduation and dropout rates
F2
Many parents and community members do not understand the various English Learner programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Districts should make the following information available on their English Learner web pages: ● An easy-to-understand description of the programs offered by the district, with
F3
The English Learner program information is not readily accessible on district websites.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Districts should consider starting or expanding Two-Way Bilingual Immersion programs.
F4
Two-Way Immersion programs are not widely available in Santa Cruz County.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Information on Two-Way Bilingual Immersion programs should be made available to parents of English speakers.
F5
Two-Way Immersion programs are beneficial to native English speakers who want to become fluent in multiple languages.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The next version of Pajaro Valley Unified School District’s pamphlets, slide sets, video, and websites should revise the Dual-Language Immersion information to: ● Use consistent terminology throughout the district. For example, the district refers to a “Dual-Language Immersion” program, and Alianza (which provides the program) calls it “Two-Way Bilingual Immersion.” ● Update the description of how the waiver process works, as applied to Alianza, to clarify that neither the annual waiver, nor the need for at least 20 approved waivers by parents, is applicable because of Alianza’s status as a charter school. ● The “English Learner Programs” pamphlet should more clearly distinguish the differences between Late-Exit “Developmental” Bilingual, and Two-Way Bilingual Immersion.
F6
Portions of the descriptive material made available by the Pajaro Valley Unified School District describing the Dual-Language Immersion program are inconsistent or incomplete, which could be misleading to parents trying to decide on the best program for their children.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The districts should develop agreements for collaboration with the appropriate Head Start agencies to better align and take advantage of the school readiness efforts of Head Start.
F7
Collaboration and communication between Head Start and the elementary schools would be beneficial to English Learners making the transition to kindergarten.
No recommendations for this finding
Commendations 1
-
CM1 Page 23C1. The Grand Jury congratulates all the Santa Cruz County English Learners who have persevered and successfully completed the uphill climb to English fluency. We also acknowledge all the teachers, staff, administrators, and parents who provided support along the way. C2. The State of California passed Assembly Bill 815 creating a State Seal of Biliteracy Award. As of January 1, 2012, graduating seniors who achieve the biliterate, bilingual standards will be honored with a gold insignia on their diplomas. County students in several school districts received the award this year, and PVUSD was ahead of its time presenting deserving seniors this award starting last year.
Observations 11
-
OB1 Page 16low-income students and mid-high income students by the second grade.[55] Every year California school children take STAR tests designed to assess their knowledge on English Language Arts, Mathematics, and a number of other subjects. To understand the extent of the gap across the three districts, we obtained student test results from the California Department of Education online database, which contains years of test results for all schools in California. Figure 3 shows district test results for both Mathematics and English Language Arts scores, for three student subgroups, in each of the three districts reviewed. For each subgroup (English Only, Reclassified, and English Learner) the height of the bar represents the percentage of each group that scored Proficient or above on the STAR test. For example, of the PVUSD fourth-graders who took the English Language Arts STAR test, 72% of the English Only group, 86% of the reclassified students, and 19% of the English Learners scored Proficient or above. Note that these tests are given in English, and, by definition, English Learners are not yet proficient in English. The scores for General Math, Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II are compiled at the end of the course and are not associated with a specific grade level, since they can be taken in different grades. The Grand Jury observed the reclassified group’s unexpectedly high scores. Their scores are initially higher than English Only scores and then taper off. One reason for this can be found in the state’s AYP Information Guide,[47] which states that reclassified student scores should continue to be included in the English Learner subgroup, until scoring proficient or above three times.
-
OB2 Page 18Tests are given in English only, and, by definition, English Learners are not yet proficient in English.
-
OB3 Page 18The achievement scores for English Learners tend to stay low, because as soon as those students become proficient in English, and their scores increase, they are reclassified and removed from the English Learner group.
-
OB4 Page 18Ceiba spends more classroom hours per day, and more school days, than any other middle school in the district.
-
OB5 Page 14No districts publish data on program effectiveness as measured by long term achievement levels and historical trends. Again, parents need this information to make informed decisions in selecting the right program for their child. Drop-out and Graduation Rates for English Learners In 2011, the California Department of Education did its first statewide annual report on dropouts in California for the class of 2010, using “longitudinal” data. Longitudinal studies follow the same group of students over a long period of time. One of the subgroups analyzed was English Learners. Studies have indicated that dropout rates are significantly higher for English Learners. The study began when this group started high school (9th grade) and followed them through their senior year. The data for
-
OB6 Page 20Head Start and Early Head Start[77] [78] ○ serves 625 children ○ part of the Santa Cruz Community Counseling Center
-
OB7 Page 20Migrant Head Start ○ serves 752 children ○ housed by PVUSD
-
OB8 Page 20Central California Migrant Head Start[79] ○ serves 112 children ○ coordinated by Santa Cruz County Office of Education The Head Start staff realize they have a responsibility to prepare their children for kindergarten. These new kindergarten students would benefit greatly if the public schools interacted more with the Head Start programs. Some collaboration has begun between Head Start and the Freedom and Starlight Elementary schools, but much more is needed. With more collaboration and relationship-sharing strategies, these organizations could better link student data, advise parents, and smoothly promote children into the public schools. In other counties, most early childhood education programs, such as Head Start, have formal agreements in place with school districts.[12] English Learner Program Funding Schools receive additional state and federal funding for each student classified as an English Learner. A recent newspaper article stated these extra funds averaged $448 annually per English Learner statewide.[3] The primary additional funding for English Learners comes from these funds:
-
OB9 Page 20Economic Impact Aid[82] ○ This state fund is for both English Learners and economically disadvantaged students, some of whom may not be English Learners.
-
OB10 Page 20No Child Left Behind - Title III Limited-English Proficient[83] ○ Federal funding to help students achieve grade level standards and learn English.
-
OB11 Page 20No Child Left Behind Title I - Part A[84] ○ This federal fund is for low-income students who are not achieving proficiency levels; many of these children are English Learners. The annual district apportionment for these and other funds are available online at the California Department of Education website. Each district was asked to provide the average amount of additional annual funding it receives per English Learner, which is shown in Table 7 below.
No Responses Found 3
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Live Oak Elementary School District
School District
Pajaro Valley Unified
School District
Santa Cruz City Elementary School District
School District