📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Tehama County Grand Jury
• 2025-2026
2025-26 Tehama County Grand Jury Final Report
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 10 findings
F1
Page 46
The BOS meetings are a cauee for concern due to the lnablllty ofthe Board to operate u a coh•lve team. Agree; The five members of the Soard wlU not agree with each other 100% of the time.. Disagreements 1hould be respectful and civil. . I
F2
Page 44
No county offlclal has provided a clear plan for how staffing at the Re-Entry Center wlll be funded. DlsaqM a,rtially: •When completed, the Re-Entry Center will be staffed by the currentJell staff and occupied by the currant Inmate population. The Board has given raises to correctional staff, In the last round. ofemployment negotlaUons, In order to improve recruitment and retention, however, neighboring Jurisdictions have been able to provide more and have nullified any forward progress the amatl Increases In pay and benefits may have made. Faced with a looming budget deficit In the next fiscal year, a public safety sales tax initiative wlU be presented to voters In November of 2028. The largest portion ofthe funds, which are all earmarked for public safety. will be directed to Sheriff's Department tot thll purpoae. 1J1 OakStnet, R•dBl~Cf 96080 • (SJ0) sa1-46SS • Fox(SJI) sa1-3114
F3
Page 51
Due to the City of Red Bluff'• untimely repair and maintenance of roads, costs are Increasing. The City agrees with Finding F3: Deferred maintenance has resulted In roads falHng below the threshold for preventative treatment, requiring more expensive reconstruction. The City's current 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) alms to address this trajectory as fundfng ts made avaffable.
F4
Page 45
Like many countlee In Callfomla, TCSO Is strugglfng to recruit new correctlonal officers due to competition from more attractive employment opportunltlt1, contributing to ongoing Jall underatafflng. aa'llt Butte County has recently passed a large general sales tax Initiative. Butte County h88 provided significant raises to correctional staff and Is offering large 11afgn-on11 bonuses for new employees. Tehama County does not have the economy to keep up with the 'feeding franzy" of salary and benefit Increases offered by otherJurisdictions within an hour commute of Tehama County. This situation Is not new and has always been astruggle for Tehama County public safety agencies and directly affects the Tehama County Sheriff's ability to recruit and retain correctional staff. Fl. Without raolvlng the atafflng ahortage, the new Re-Entry Center will be unable to fulfill Its Intended purpoae. DJIIA'I• partlally:. The Re-Entry Center is going to be an extension ~fthe Jail and wlll serve to locally houae the Inmate population. Increasing the number of staff will directly-mcreaee the number of Inmates being housed under Title 15 and 24. Without sufficient staffing the R&-Entry Center will not be fully utilized. The Day Reporting Center wlll serve as the local re-entry program.
F5
Page 51
The roadways In the Clty ofRed Bluff create hazardous and unsafe driving conditions, presenting a significant llablllty risk to the city. The City agrHS-wlth Finding f 5: Roadway conditions do present Increased safety risks. The City is prioritizing risk mitigation through targeted repairs, ADA compllence improvements, and visibility upgrades. The City has Increased Its localized repairs as part of a scheduled maintenance program. Further, when specific emergent hazards are Identified, streets crews are responsive In correcting the Issue from potholes to tree obstructions. RE§PONS§I JO RECOMMENDATIONS
F6
Page 55
Agree. This has been an ongoing issue for the Tehama County Jail, which has lacked adequate space for safety and sobering cells for inmates confined within the facility. The problem is expected to be further exacerbated by the anticipated increase in inmate population following the jail expansion
F7
Page 46
All ofthe current BOS agreed that • Code of Conduct for the BOS would be blneficlal. Implementing a·code ofConduct could enhance publlc trust, Improve working relatlonahlpa within the BOS, and •et conalatent expectation• Chat support a rNpectful and effective governing environment. 121OoltStn.t, JudBllfl/. C4 96080 • (JJO) Sl1-16JS • Fa,c (SJfJ) Sl1-J1H ..
F8
Page 55
Partially Disagree. Volunteer-led community programs were significantly reduced during the C0VID-19 era; however, over the past year they have resumed and continue to operate within the jail, particularly in the areas of substance abuse recovery and religious services. In addition, educational opportunities are available to inmates through the use of jail-issued tablets, which provide access to a variety oflearning resources.
F9
Page 55
Partially Agree. The facility was originally designated a "re-entry center" as part of the original funding source. Over time, however, it was determined that the building would instead be utilized for mainline jail inmates rather than as a traditional" re-entry facility. Thepurposeofthis expansion is to provide additional housing capacity for individuals who are chronic or habitual offenders. The new facility will also include a modem kitchen, laundry facility, and medical wing, replacing critical infrastructure that has significantly aged since the original jail was built in 1974. The Sheriffs Office will deploy a combination of staffing strategies to operate these facilities and to transfer inmates from the existing jail into the new housing units, thereby expanding capacity and improving overall efficiency. R-ta. The Tehama County Sheriffs Office has been working in conjunction with the Board ofSupernsors for many years to establish staffing plans and cost estimates, allowing the county to evaluate potential funding sources. Currently, the TCSO and BOS are jointly committed to proposing a public safety sales tax measure, which would provide ongoing funding to support the jail expansion. It should be noted that over the past seven years, the Sheriffs Office has surrendered approximately $7.5 million in salary savings back to the County. Based on current staffing cost estim_ates, this amount wou~d have funded the staffing ofthe new facility for approximately nine years. The Sheriffs Office remains committed to working with the Board ofSupervisors to identify sustainable funding sources. This includes exploring alternatives outside ofa potential sales tax mea~~e, in the event s~c~ • an initiative does not pass. TCSO considers the successful staffing ofthe new reentry fac1ltty and expanded Jail capacity to be vital to ensuring the safety and security ofthe community. I - R-lc. The recommendation has been implemented in part and will continue to be implemented. The Tehama County Sheriff's Office has already been working in conjunction with the Public Safety Tax Ad Hoc Group to move this initiative forward as a potential ballot measure for the November 2026 election. The Sheriff's Office acknowledges the ongoing need for sustainable funding to support jail housing and operations, and to ensure adequate staffing through recruitment and retention efforts. The Sheriff's Office hopes the Board ofSupervisors also recognizes the priority and necessity ofj ail expansion and public safety and remains committed to identifying alternative funding sources in addition to a sales tax initiative to ensure long-tenn stability.
F10
Page 45
Prevloua attempts to aecure funding for Re-Entry Center staffing through county tax m11aunta have been unaucceNful due to 1neufflclent community support. Am•; 83% ofvoters did not auppo,:t Measure G in 2020. Unofficial polling reflects adistrustthat the County would utilize the proposed 1% aalee tax revenue for tho intonded purpoae. Rtctrnro•ndatlona;
Recommendations 8
-
R1Page 48The BOS shall hire an outside mediator to raolve dlfferenC88 between the Shtrtff and the CA by October 1, 202&. • Ib• [icpmmandatigp b•• notbf•o lmpl•m•nt,d w111 be; but The BOS recognizes the importance of a cooperative relatlonshlp between tha Sheriff and the CA. Mediation wlll be offered In the future pending the outcome of a formal Investigation and within abc (6) months ofthe outcome ofthe currant/pending Investigation. •
-
R1aPage 45The BOS and the TCSO shall work together to provide a plan ta secure the money needed to fully staff the Re-Entry Canter and the Jill. Thi• plan should be preaented at• BOS meeting by January 1, 2028. IblIIPWDmtodlJleO r,auJga turtb•f'anliv,11: The BOS, TCSO and other publlc safety departments are working cooperatively to draft a publlc safety tax initiative to secure funding for jail staffing and other publlc safety needs. A coat analysis and plan to achieve full correctional staffing along with an analysls of anticipated revenue from·a aalea tax Initiative, and/or other sources, ahall be reported by December 31, 2025. 717Oak Strul, R.dBllflf, CA 96IJ80 • (SJfJ) Jl7-46JJ • Fa{JJO) Sl'l-376' ...._ Tehama County In rurmoH Board of Supervieora ofthe County ofTehama shall respond tot • Findings: F1, F2, F4, F6, F7, F10 ~ • Recommendations: R1, R3, R4, R5 ,flgdlnp1;
-
R1bPage 47The BOS ahall reinstate the Ad Hoc Public Safety Tax Initiative Working Group by August 30, 2025. This group 1hall presenta plan for securing addltfonal tax revenue without unduly burdening the Gltlzen1 of tht county. All revenue lhaB go to a dedicated publlc eafaty fund forJall and Re-entry center atafflng. The plan • shill be presented at a BOS meeting by December 31,202&. Ib• 1JCPmmandat1an bu bean •mJJlamentect, The Ad Hoc Public 8af8ty Tax Initiative Committee is currently active after taking a pause for approximately 8 months. Recommendation R1 b suggests all revenue generated by the tax Initiative be directed towards Jail and Re-entry staffing. The Convnlttee'a current recommendation la to earmark the money generated by the sales ta>e to Improve and support all public aafefy departments (Sheriff, District Attorney, Probation and Fire). The Sheriffs Office would receive the largest percentage of funds using adistribution formula.
-
R1cPage 47The BOS and the TCSO shall work together to pruent a plan to educate the community on the nece■alty ofth•• funds and gain community truat that the funds Will be used ••Intended. Efforts could Include but lhOUld not be limited to: town hall meetings, public preaantatlona, 1-clllty tours, PSAs, 1tc. Thia plan should be preaented at a BOS meeting by December 31, 2025. Thi• recommandation.b•• not blfp 1mplem9ntad byt itwllh• The proposed sales tax Initiative Is a cooperative effort ofall public aafety departments Which Includes the Board of Supervlaora, Sheriff, District Attorney, Probation and Fire. The BOS and TCSO will provide the legally acceptable, necessary Information to support the sales tax Initiative, but will lean heavily on labor organizations and cftfZens to market the measure to the public.
-
R2Page 47Tha BOS and the TCSO work together to make a plan to addre. .retention and poulble bonuaN for attracting and retaining correctional officers. Thia plan shall be preaented at • B~S meeting by January 1, 2028. • 'Tblf mnDVDtodatJcid baa·.aot'.tiito-•fniiJ•ro•atfd but 11 wm: Aa part ofthe cost analyals requested for the R1 a; proposed salary, benefits and •bonuaes• should be considered as a necessary component for recruitment and retention, 121 Oak Str••t, R•dBllf!T, Cf 96080 • (S30) S11-46SS • Fax (nl) SJ?-316' 6Dn■;. The County will adopt the code of conduct for the BOS.
-
R3Page 48The BOS ah■II adopt and algn the TCGJ'a euggHted Code of Conduct, or lnatltute their own v•rafon, by October 1, 202&. Thia Code ofConduct shall ba reviewed and revised aa needed and shall be al"ned annually by the urvlng BOS. b!t:!:r!T62l"'on hg ·not bgn (mplfmtnt,d.but·wJll'be,lmplementedrbv -. - .
-
R4Page 48The BOS shall adopt the Public Code ofConduct auggesteil by the TCGJ, or write one oftheir own, by October 1, 2021. The Code ehall be placed on th• front page ofthe BOS agenda that la available to the publlc. TCGJ also augg•ta Itbe projected on th• screen prior to the offlclal start ofthe BOS meeting. lbt recommendation b•• oo(IMd linv!l-'oi♦Uil5' butwm bei The Code ofConduct will be distributed aa link that is poeted on the website and displayed In the Board chambers. RI. TCGJ recommend• the Publlc Comment period be moved tram the beginning ofthe BOS maetlnga to the end ofthe mtttlnga by October 1, 2021. Ib• l!iPQJrotndation will not be lmplem,ntad2 The BOS must balance Its responsibility to get County business accomplished efficiently with the desire of the public to be involved in the procesa. Public comments can set a negative tone and delay the start of offlclal business. Some commenters use their time to talk about things that don't even pertain to County buslnesa. '{a1 Oak Slr•t1t, R•dBluff, C4 96080 • (SJO) 5Z1-46SS • Fax (S30) 521-J'/6' •• The meeting is a public forum where the constitutional right offree speech la protected. In considering the recommendation, the BOS wlll limftthe open pubUc comment time to 30 minutes at the beginning of the meeting. ffthe comment period fa dosed by the chair after 30 minutes, an additional public comment period wlll be opened at the end of the meeting. This will be brought back·to the Board after January 1, 2026 to evaluate the change. • Sincerely, '1,--l+--· District4 SuperviaOr Matt Hanaan, Chairman Tehama County Board of Supervieor 'IJ1 Or,kSlr#I, Bid•1lfll, C4 96/JIIJ • (SJO) SJ146SS • Ftut (SJO) SJ1J'IU crnr OF RED BLUFF 555 Washington Street. Red Bluff, Callfomla 96080 (530) 527-2605; Fax(530) 529-6878 www.cityofredbluff.org August 6, 2025 Honorable Jonathan W. Skillman Presiding Judge of the Tehama County Superior Court 1740 Walnut Street Red Bluff, CA 98080 RE: City of Red BluffResponse to the 2024-2025 Tehama County Grand Jury Report: Red Bluff Roads Dear Judge Skillman The City of Red Bluff, having received and reviowed the Findings of Tehama County Grand Jury dated June 24, 2025, hereby submits the following responses: RESPONSES TO FINDINGS
-
R7Page 52The Grand Jury recommends that the City ofRed Bluffpropose a spacial use sales tax dedicatedto citystreetImprovementsand enhance public awarenessthrough social media advertising to promote the proposed tax. The R7 recommendation requires further analysis: While Measure R (special sales tax measure for streets) was not approved by voters In 2024, the City will evaluate future tax measure strategies and public outreach approaches. This analysis will be conducted over the next 12 months In conjunction with convnunity engagement efforts. "'The QtyofRed Blufflsan Equal Opportunity Provider CLOSING STATEMENT The City ofRed Bluff acknowledges the findings ofthe Tehama County Grand Jury and appreciates the thorough evafuatlon ofour city's roadway Infrastructure. We remain committed to making data-driven and community-supported investments In street maintenance, safety, and sustainability. Respectfully submitted, ~'"D±- sOieters, Mayor City of Red Bluff CC: Red Bluff, CA 98080 "'The CityofRed BluffIs an Equal Opportunity Provider TEHAMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ~ . . Dave Kain. Sheriff-Coroner ~J/\~Y. /;5. Mailmg A<ldr~ss: P.O. [fox i.::9, Red Blun: CA %OMO ~ ytJf Main Otlke: :!1S40 Anteklpe 131n.l., Rl!d Blutl: CA 96080 ,sJoi s,::9.7940 '1sJ015:!lJ-7l)JJ FAX Juil,Dispatch: SO~ O.ik St., Red Blull CA %080 (5.30) 529-7lJ(J(); (530) 5:?8-761-1 FAX September 9, 2025 /2025 P.O. Box 1061 Red Bluff, CA 96080 The Honorable Jonathan W. Skillman Judge of the Superior Court 1740 Walnut Street Red Bluff, CA 96080 Re: Tehama County Sheriffs response to 2024/2025 final report Dear Honorable Judge Skillman: As always, let me start by thanking the members ofthe Grand Jury for their arduous work and dedication this past year; I have received and have thoroughly reviewed the 2024/2025 Tehama County Grand Jury Final Report. I am pleased to respond to the following items as requested by the Grand Jury. F-2. Response: Partially Agree. The Sheriff's Office, under both the prior and current administrations, has multiple times provided informational presentations to the current and former Boards of Supervisors in accordance with the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) guidelines. These presentations included clear plans outlining the staffing requirements for the re-entry center, including the number of positions needed and the associated costs. Each time, the Board approved these staffing plans. However, no county official has developed or implemented a plan identifying how the staffing costs will be funded. F-4. Response: Agree. The Tehama County Sheriff's Office (TCSO) is experiencing significant chaUenges i~ remaining competitiv.e in the labor marke~ for correctional deputies. Comparator counties consistently provide higher pay, benefits, and hiring incentives, placing TCSO near the bottom of the salary / benefits scale which causes on going difficulty attracting and retaining qualified candidates. Furthermore, between 2022 and 2024, California's Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by approximately 15%. During that same period, correctional deputies in Tehama County received cumulative: wage increases of only obout 5.5%, further widening the gap between market conditions and compensation levels for this critical classification. Serving Our Cotnmunity with P.R.I.D.E. o.... ,.·~-.. :-.--1! •.•• n -- , • - • • -· I. F-6. Agree. This has been an ongoing issue for the Tehama County Jail, which has lacked adequate space for safety and sobering cells for inmates confined within the facility. The problem is expected to be further exacerbated by the anticipated increase in inmate population following the jail expansion F-8. Partially Disagree. Volunteer-led community programs were significantly reduced during the C0VID-19 era; however, over the past year they have resumed and continue to operate within the jail, particularly in the areas of substance abuse recovery and religious services. In addition, educational opportunities are available to inmates through the use of jail-issued tablets, which provide access to a variety oflearning resources. F-9. Partially Agree. The facility was originally designated a "re-entry center" as part of the original funding source. Over time, however, it was determined that the building would instead be utilized for mainline jail inmates rather than as a traditional" re-entry facility. Thepurposeofthis expansion is to provide additional housing capacity for individuals who are chronic or habitual offenders. The new facility will also include a modem kitchen, laundry facility, and medical wing, replacing critical infrastructure that has significantly aged since the original jail was built in 1974. The Sheriffs Office will deploy a combination of staffing strategies to operate these facilities and to transfer inmates from the existing jail into the new housing units, thereby expanding capacity and improving overall efficiency. R-ta. The Tehama County Sheriffs Office has been working in conjunction with the Board ofSupernsors for many years to establish staffing plans and cost estimates, allowing the county to evaluate potential funding sources. Currently, the TCSO and BOS are jointly committed to proposing a public safety sales tax measure, which would provide ongoing funding to support the jail expansion. It should be noted that over the past seven years, the Sheriffs Office has surrendered approximately $7.5 million in salary savings back to the County. Based on current staffing cost estim_ates, this amount wou~d have funded the staffing ofthe new facility for approximately nine years. The Sheriffs Office remains committed to working with the Board ofSupervisors to identify sustainable funding sources. This includes exploring alternatives outside ofa potential sales tax mea~~e, in the event s~c~ • an initiative does not pass. TCSO considers the successful staffing ofthe new reentry fac1ltty and expanded Jail capacity to be vital to ensuring the safety and security ofthe community. I - R-lc. The recommendation has been implemented in part and will continue to be implemented. The Tehama County Sheriff's Office has already been working in conjunction with the Public Safety Tax Ad Hoc Group to move this initiative forward as a potential ballot measure for the November 2026 election. The Sheriff's Office acknowledges the ongoing need for sustainable funding to support jail housing and operations, and to ensure adequate staffing through recruitment and retention efforts. The Sheriff's Office hopes the Board ofSupervisors also recognizes the priority and necessity ofj ail expansion and public safety and remains committed to identifying alternative funding sources in addition to a sales tax initiative to ensure long-tenn stability. R-2. The recommendation will be implemented. The Tehama County Sherifrs Office is committed to increasing salaries and benefits for all staff, including correctional deputies, as a means ofretaining qualified and well-trained employees and attracting new applicants. By doing so, the Sheriff's Office will be positioned to recruit local talent and ensure that this talent is retained in service ofpublic safety for years to come. The Sheriffs Office further supports the use ofretention bonuses to reward employees who have dedicated themselves to serving their community, rather than relying solely on hiring incentives. Additionally, the County should regularly review comparator counties for the samejob classifications and conduct compensation and classification studies to ensure that salaries remain consistent with surrounding agencies. These comparator counties are already utilized during collective bargaining negotiations and should serve as the benchmark for competitiveness. The Sheriff's Office also encourages the County to enter negotiations earlier with bargaining units in order to resolve disputes before contracts expire. This proactive approach would help build trust and morale among employees while reducing the risks associated with prolonged negotiations. R-3. The recommendation will be implemented. The Tehama County Sheriff's Office will produce a written plan prior to December 31, 2025, outlining steps to expand safety and sobering cell capacity within the jail. A preliminary plan was previously identified during the jail expansion projec~ which envisioned repurposing the areas currently occupied by the laundry and kitchen facilities in the main jail as potential sobering and safety cell space once those operations are relocated. The Sheriff's Office will formalize this into a written plan once the new facilities are operational and the designated spaces in the main jail become available, allowing the County to move forward with this critical project.