⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
Page 1
The code compliance audit does not review or inspect the following:
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 1
By January 1, 2016, the Planning Department to increase the number of yearly
F2
Page 1
In the audit years 2011-2013, the number of wineries that were out of
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 1
By June 30, 2016, the Planning Department and the Planning Commissioners
F3
Page 1
The County’s ability to expand the audit program is limited because only 30%
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 1
By January 1, 2016, the Planning Department to make the inspection reports
F4
Page 1
Penalties or restriction of wineries’ activities for non-compliance is
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 1
By June 30, 2016, the county Board of Supervisors and the Planning
F5
Page 1
The lack of specificity in the winery database for actual production quantities
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Page 1
By June 30, 2016, the Planning Commissioners to establish and publish a
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Napa County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office