Contra Costa County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
• Agency Response
Response to:
Community Courts
Richard D. Pio Roda*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 1 findings
F5
adequate number of copies of the employment agreement in question available for the members of the public who were in attendance at Respondent's meeting of October 8, 2014. Furthermore, if there were requests for additional copies (Respondent cannot recall whether such a request was made during the meeting), staff would have made more copies immediately; that is Respondent's routine custom and practice. Respondent's meetings are well attended by District firefighters, who are happy to assist members of the public with anything they need or request during Respondent's meetings, be it more chairs, climate control, or additional copies of agendas or documents.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Respondent's website is a limited public forum that has specific time, place and manner restrictions inherent to it. It is not reasonable for Respondent to change its website's status as a limited public forum for this particular purpose. However, pursuant to Respondent's response to R4 above, Respondent will prepare for discussion an analysis of the impacts of including a link for citizens to post concerns about possible Brown Act infractions. OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA SAN DIEGO A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Sherry Rufini September 10, 2015
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.