📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Score: 0 (1/2/1)
Inyo County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Inyo County Office of the Public Guardian

View PDF View Full Original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F5, F10, F11

Findings 10 findings

F2 Page 27
The present job description of the office of Public Guardian does not include a duty to petition the Court for reasonable fees from the conservatorship estates which have substantial assets.
F3 Page 27
The Public Guardian is authorized by law to petition the Court for reasonable fees for its services just as would a private attorney.
F4 Page 27
There is now and has been a Court Ordered fee schedule in place for the Public Guardian to seek fees for its services in Conservatorship estates which have assets to pay for those services. FS. The Public Guardian is legally obligated to file periodic accountings with the Court to report on the services rendered and the beginning and ending amounts of both cash and non-cash assets of the estate and all income and expenses in the accounting period. At this time, it is the practice to also request fees for the services of the Public Guardian and the County Counsel for acting as the PG's attorney in filing the petition. In Inyo County, the practice is to file these petitions every two years.
F6 Page 27
The Public Guardian has consistently failed to ask for the fees justified by the Court ordered Public Guardian fees Schedule then in effect.
F7 Page 27
There is presently a good system of oversight to be sure that the Public Guardian is giving good care to the conservatees.
F8 Page 27
There is no system of oversight presently in place in Inyo County to be sure that the Public Guardian is seeking reasonable fees for its services for the benefit of the County tax payers.
F9 Page 27
The reasonable value of the services performed by the Public Guardian as conservator of the conservatee is to be measured at least in part, under both past fee schedules and the newly ordered fee schedule, by the amount of time devoted by the Public Guardian in taking care of the physical, medical and financial needs and concerns of the conservatee. Fl0. The Public Guardian's office has not, at least in recent years, kept track of the time devoted to taking care of its conservatees. Fll. Keeping track of the time spent is not a difficult or time consuming task and several computer programs are available for the purpose.
F12 Page 27
Only a minimal effort is required to compute the appropriate fee for the Public Guardian using the fee schedule. It is not difficult in larger estates to multiply months of service times the $200 per month allowed in the Schedule.
F13 Page 27
While the first priority of the Public Guardian is taking care of the conservatees, the county taxpayers deserve to be reasonably compensated for the services rendered at their expense where there are sufficient assets in the conservatorship to do so. 27
F14 Page 28
The Public Guardian is consistently late, often very late, in filing its Accounting and reports with the Court. FlS. A system of oversight to insure timely filings is not working well.

Recommendations 14

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.