⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Conclusions 1
-
CL1In view of the totality of circumstances, including the number of pending lawsuits which involve the use of TASERs in Stanislaus County, it is the opinion of the 2009-2010 Civil Grand Jury that it would be inappropriate to take a position on the TASER policy or make any recommendations at this time. The Civil Grand Jury is publicizing the above policy solely in an effort to increase the publices awareness. RESPONSE No response is required. Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate in any Civil Grand Jury investigation.