Sonoma County Grand Jury • 2016-2017 • Agency Response
Response to: Planning for Groundwater Sustainability

https://www.recyclenow.org*

Published: June 16, 2017 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1 Page 2
The Sonoma County Waste Management Agency (SCWMA) can neither agree nor disagree with this finding, as SCWMA staff was not present during these negotiations and cannot determine whether the electricity rates and heavy equipment values were specifically identified in negotiations or valued properly.
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 2
While the SCWMA agrees that the Central Landfill was closed for five years and reopened shortly after Republic assumed responsibility for operations, the SCWMA Executive Director does not agree that the failure to adhere to industry best practices alone caused a five year closure.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 3
The SCWMA is a separate legal entity from the County, and has no authority over the County's internal policies for reviewing contracts, operations and interagency cooperation. The SCWMA therefore cannot fully address the specific recommendation made in R2. However, the SCWMA can responding to the interagency cooperation aspect of this recommendation from the SCWMA's perspective. The SCWMA is strongly committed to assisting all member agencies with regard to solid waste issues and franchise agreements. For example, the SCWMA has recently assisted the Town of Windsor and the City of Santa Rosa in the evaluation of proposals for their respective franchise agreement procurement processes. The SCWMA would extend that assistance to the County of Sonoma for future solid waste agreements it may consider in the future.
F3 Page 2
The SCWMA agrees that a 20 year agreement with the Ratto Group was approved by the County of Sonoma, but does not have an opinion to express on the normalcy of that process or agreement.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 3
The SCWMA is strongly committed to securing short-term and long-term capacity solutions for wood waste, green waste, and co-mingled residential food waste generated within Sonoma County and under SCWMA control. When it was determined that the Central Disposal Site was not a feasible location for a SCWMA composting facility, the SCWMA created a plan to implement a new procurement process in which the private sector proposes solutions for properly dealing with organic material generated in Sonoma County. That process is ongoing, has generated significant interest from potential proposers, and proposals are due October 16, 2017. 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Phone: 707.565.3579 Fax: 707.565.3701 www.recyclenow.org
F4 Page 2
The SCWMA Executive Director agrees that there was conflict between the SCWMA and County of Sonoma. However, SCWMA staff does not believe the SCWMA's mandate to divert material in compliance with AB 939 was compromised. When the SCWMA's composting facility stopped accepting unprocessed green waste and wood waste, that incoming feedstock was redirected to other composting facilities outside of Sonoma County. From an AB 939 compliance perspective, the SCWMA continued to divert green and wood waste from landfill disposal, despite the closure of the SCWMA compost facility. The closure of the facility made dealing with incoming materials more complex and expensive, but did not cause previously diverted materials to be landfilled.
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 2
The SCWMA Executive Director agrees that out-hauling green waste has added costs which are borne by ratepayers. SCWMA staff disagrees with the statement that the SCWMA will be involved in the permitting of a new compost operator. If a new site is selected through 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Phone: 707.565.3579 Fax: 707.565.3701 <a href="https://www.recyclenow.org">www.recyclenow.org</a> the SCWMA's process, the private operator will be responsible for securing any and all permits, including land use with the jurisdiction in which the site is located, solid waste, air quality, and water quality. Explanations of Recommendation Conclusions R2 and R3
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.