Santa Clara County Grand Jury • 2019-2020

The Case of the Felonious Process Server

Published: December 14, 2020 9 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 2 findings

F1a
The Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder’s Office did not receive notification of felony convictions of a registered process server from the Subsequent Arrest Notification System. Because the Clerk- Recorder’s Office did not receive a notification as required by California Penal Code § 11105, the process server’s registration was not revoked.
No recommendations for this finding
F1b
The Clerk-Recorder’s Office is not responsible for possible errors by the court or the state in entering and/or disclosing felony information that is supposed to make its way to the Subsequent Arrest Notification System. There is no agreed-upon process or procedure for the Clerk-Recorder’s Office to communicate with the Department of Justice, other than the Subsequent Arrest Notification System. As a result, the Clerk-Recorder's Office cannot resolve questions regarding registered process servers who may have been convicted of felonies.
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office