📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Sacramento County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Haggin Oaks Golf Course “Teeing Off on Safety” Issue
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
1: The City of Sacramento does not require a permit when work is completed on City property; however, the CCL did obtain permits for these projects.
F2
1: The cart washing machine was added to eliminate water standing in and around the cart barn. This machine conserves water by recycling and filtering it as carts are washed without polluting the creek.
F3
1: This installation used the Request For Quote process to identify the most responsive contractor.
F4
1:The City is aware of the tree problem and is addressing the issue by hiring an arborist to visually inspect the trees.
Recommendations 3
-
R1None. The Grand Jury commends the Department of Convention, Culture and Leisure for going beyond the City’s construction requirements.
-
R2It is recommended that the course Operations Manager notify CCL as soon as the equipment is operational.
-
R4The Grand Jury recommends that the CCL post along the course signs warning of possible falling trees Response Requirements Penal Code sections 933 and 933.5 require that specific responses to both the