📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Yuba County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Animal Care Services

14 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 16
The select list of contractors employed by MJUSD for its lease-leaseback contracting is a closed pool of contractors with little or no competition. This has resulted in a closed and exclusive list of contractors, subject to favoritism or abuse, noted by the large percentage of contract dollars awarded to two general contractors with previous relationships to personnel in the Facilities Department.
F2 Page 16
The Facilities Department has no established criteria for the hiring of local subcontractors to enable the bond money to stay within the community and there are no established procedures for adding new contractors on a regular basis to ensure securing “best value” for the taxpayers.
F3 Page 16
The MJUSD needs to establish a method to ensure the ethics laws of California are being adhered to in the contracting of services. The staff at MJUSD is not provided ethics training at this time.
F4 Page 16
There is minimal review of lease-leaseback contracts by the MJUSD Board. The Board is given a listed contractor on a project by the Facilities Department. The Board does not have the Yuba County Grand Jury Final Report June 25, 2009 opportunity to review the full range of proposals to ensure equity, fairness and oversight in awarding contracts paid by public bond funds.

Recommendations 4