📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2011-2012

Santa Cruz County Grand Jury 2011-2012 Final Report Page 133 Rtc, County & Pvusd Responses to the Santa Cruz County

Published: June 28, 2012 134 pages Consolidated Report
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 7 findings

F1
The Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for English Learner progress are complex, give little indication of how long it takes English Learners to become reclassified as fluent, and do not measure the effectiveness of individual English Learner programs.
F2
Many parents and community members do not understand the various English Learner programs.
F3
The English Learner program information is not readily accessible on district websites.
F4
Two-Way Immersion programs are not widely available in Santa Cruz County.
F5
Two-Way Immersion programs are beneficial to native English speakers who want to become fluent in multiple languages.
F6
Portions of the descriptive material made available by the Pajaro Valley Unified School District describing the Dual-Language Immersion program are inconsistent or incomplete, which could be misleading to parents trying to decide on the best program for their children.
F7
Collaboration and communication between Head Start and the elementary schools would be beneficial to English Learners making the transition to kindergarten.

Recommendations 6