Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2016-2017 • Agency Response
Response to: Funding the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District

Response from East Contra Costa Fire Protection District

Published: September 12, 2017 8 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 1 findings

F12 Page 1
Additionally, as noted in response to R3, above, the District is preparing to undertake strategic planning, which likely will include a workshopping process with the other governmental agencies to investigate options for additional funding. Should this process indicate another task force is needed, the District will consider forming another task force with a to-be-determined scope, goals, membership, etc. 13768887.1 4. “The ECCFPD Board should consider supporting legislation to reallocate property tax revenues from one or more local agencies to ECCFPD.” Response: This
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
“ECCFPD accepted and implemented recommendations made by the Fire District Task Force.” Response: The District agrees. The Fire District Task Force made five recommendations:  The District was to commission and staff the Knightsen station with financial support from the cities of Brentwood and Oakley. This recommendation was accepted and implemented.  The parties were to form a grass roots, community based group to educate the public on fire and medical response risks and requirements. This was implemented by the District along with the cities of Brentwood and Oakley.  A consultant was to be engaged to explore the possibility of a 2016 ballot initiative to bring more funding for fire and medical response services in the District. The cities of Brentwood and Oakley opted to propose city taxes, rather than a more regional measure, in 2016.  The parties were to consider including the following ideas in a potential 2016 ballot initiative: a) making the ECCFPD an independent district with an elected board, b) changing the District's name to make it clear it is not a “county” agency, and c) establishing a citizen’s oversight committee to oversee implementation of changes as a result of a successful revenue measure. The District placed Measure N on the ballot to transition to an elected Board. Measure N passed and the first elected Board will be elected in November of 2018. The cities' utility user tax measures and companion advisory measures did not (and could not) address the other listed concepts.  Finally, a master plan for the District was to be completed to address the service needs for current and future populations of the District. The District engaged Citygate Associates to perform a Standards of Cover and Headquarters Staffing Master Plan, which was completed in 2016. Where appropriate and financially feasible, the District has taken steps to implement recommendations in the study. 13768887.1 Grand Jury Recommendations and District Responses:

Conclusions 1