📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2019-2020

F2. LRCCD’s Guided Pathways module does not by itself allow for students to seamlessly

Published: May 24, 2020 15 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 13 findings

F1 Page 137
Legalization, increased availability, and easy access have led to misconceptions regarding marijuana use, particularly with youth.
F2 Page 136
LRCCD’s Guided Pathways module does not by itself allow for students to seamlessly transfer between Academic and Career Technical Education (CTE) programs.
F3 Page 136
The success of Guided Pathways is dependent upon adequate counseling services and perhaps a change in the counseling model.
F4 Page 136
LRCCD lacks a formal survey process for students at entrance and exit in order to better understand student achievement issues.
F5 Page 136
LRCCD’s financial flexibility to adjust existing or new programs and services to meet student achievement goals is constrained by the fiscal requirements between the Fifty Percent Law and the collective bargaining agreements.
F6 Page 136
The quantity and scope of Online classes are insufficient to meet the work/life issues of two large cohorts of LRCCD’s students: those 25 or older, which comprise nearly 40 percent of students overall and part-time students that represent approximately 70 percent of students.
F7 Page 136
CTE programs take an estimated six years to develop and produce the first graduates. This is too long to reach the fast-changing demands in the labor market. 2018-2019 RECOMMENDATIONS
F8 Page 138
Since each school district in the County runs its own programs related to alcohol and other drugs, there is a significant variation in the resources available to students and their families throughout Sacramento County. 2018-2019 RECOMMENDATIONS
F9 Page 140
After voting to award health benefits to Board members, no further action was taken, no policies were created, and no health insurance benefits were awarded to Board 139 members. The Board could institute health benefits for themselves with no further public discussion.
F10 Page 141
The practice of conducting closed sessions after open sessions at the Board meeting may lead to an uninformed public and forestalls knowledge or comments. This practice does not encourage public engagement.
F11 Page 141
Candidate pools for Board Member seats are so low that elections are sometimes not required. As a consequence, Board members are appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, denying a voice to the public in selection of those who represent them.
F12 Page 141
The lack of adequate Board member awareness of regulations, operations, and institutional history can lead to poor decisions on the part of the Board and leads to an over-reliance on the General Manager and staff.
F13 Page 141
There is a pronounced lack of public oversight of the FRCD, as shown by poorly attended meetings and few Board candidates. 2018-2019 RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations 11