📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Humboldt County Grand Jury • 2007-2008

Martin Frederick Cotton II

3 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 42
Concerning the investigation of Cotton, a perceived conflict of interest exists because two of the three represented agencies on the CIRT were directly involved in the Cotton incident.
F2 Page 42
There is a significant population of mentally ill in Humboldt County who often has contact with local law enforcement. GRAND JURY OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY 2007-2008 Final Report
F3 Page 43
The video system located in the HCCF sobering cell, which housed Cotton, produced video of poor quality.
F4 Page 43
The HCCF sobering cell is primarily constructed of concrete surfaces and is only partially padded.
F5 Page 43
The Humboldt County Sheriff Department’s policy and procedure for booking and sobering cell procedures is well written, but may not have been completely followed with regards to Cotton’s last incarceration.
F6 Page 43
Eureka Police Department’s policy and procedure may not have been completely followed during Cotton’s arrest.

Recommendations 5