8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Sonoma County offices follow state law by posting the State Attorney General’s hotline number on employee bulletin boards.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Cotati agrees with this finding. F2. Many of the larger counties and several cities in California have created their own whistleblower programs. Most are provided only for their own employees.
R1
Every governmental unit: county, city, school board or special district should encourage employees and citizens alike to report suspected waste, fraud or abuse issues to a central county reporting location. This local whistleblower hotline should be administered by the Civil Grand Jury or the Auditor-Controller’s office to provide anonymity and assurance that investigations will be thorough and impartial for any government entity in Sonoma County. Why would the Grand Jury want the County of Sono...
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
, the City does not believe a central Whistleblower program is the most cost effective or timely way to respond to citizen or employee complaints. The City believes it currently provides clear and easily accessible information about its complaint processes but will continue to work to improve information available on its website. Recommendation R3 The county budget for 2011/2012 and forward, include the cost of a commercial whistleblower hotline service (est. less than $15,000/yr), either as part of the operating budget of the Civil Grand Jury or the office of the Auditor / Controller.
F2
Many of the larger counties and several cities in California have created their own whistleblower programs. Most are provided only for their own employees.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Cotati agrees with this finding. F3. There is no central administrator in Sonoma County to report evidence of waste, fraud and abuse among the multitude of local governmental organizations and to ensure that a fair and confidential investigation takes place.
R2
When a Sonoma County central whistleblower program and administrator is established, every governmental unit should provide clear, easily accessible information about the program and 24- hour hotline on their websites, in their employee training and as a notice on employee bulletin boards.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
As stated in
F3
There is no central administrator in Sonoma County to report evidence of waste, fraud and abuse among the multitude of local governmental organizations and to ensure that a fair and confidential investigation takes place.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
We partially agree with this finding; however, the City of Cotati acknowledges that the County of Sonoma provides a variety of access points for a complainant to come forward with issues in a safe and effective manner. F4. The cost to implement a whistleblower program applicable to all governmental units in Sonoma County would be modest and initially focused on publicizing contact information and educating employees and citizens about its availability. City of Cotati Response to Final Grand Jury Report dated June 29, 2011
R3
The county budget for 2011/2012 and forward, include the cost of a commercial whistleblower hotline service (est. less than $15,000/ yr), either as part of the operating budget of the Civil Grand Jury or the office of the Auditor / Controller.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
As noted above, the City of Cotati does not believe that a central county whistleblower reporting location is feasible or warranted; however, the City agrees that annual reporting for public entities is appropriate. R4. The designated office for Sonoma County should provide an annual report to the public on the whistleblower program including such information as the total number of whistleblower complaints received, the number of complaints that were formally investigated, and the dollar value (if applicable) that was recovered.
F4
The cost to implement a whistleblower program applicable to all governmental units in Sonoma County would be modest and initially focused on publicizing contact information and educating employees and citizens about its availability.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
We disagree with this finding. The City of Cotati does not believe that a central county whistleblower reporting location is financially feasible or warranted. R1. Every governmental unit: county, city, school board or special district should encourage employees and citizens alike to report suspected waste, fraud or abuse issues to a central county reporting location. This local whistleblower hotline should be administered by the Civil Grand Jury or the Auditor-Controller's office to provide anonymity and assurance that investigations will be thorough and impartial for any government entity in...
R4
The designated office for Sonoma County should provide an annual report to the public on the whistleblower program including such information as the total number of whistleblower complaints received, the number of complaints that were formally investigated, and the dollar value (if applicable) that was recovered. REQUIRED RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE QUESTIONS IN
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 15 days
Score: -1
As noted above, the City of Cotati does not believe that a central county whistleblower reporting location is feasible or warranted. City of Cotati Response to Final Grand Jury Report dated June 29, 2011
CITY OF HEALDSBURG ADMINISTRATION 401 Grove Street CITY OF HEALDSBURG Healdsburg, CA 95448-4723 Phone: (707) 431-3317 Fax: (707) 431-3321 Visit us at www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us August 16, 2011 Approved: Superior Court Judge Honorable Gary Nadler, Presiding Judge Date: Sonoma County Superior Court 600 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 PERSONAL PROPERTY. Re: 2010-2011 Grand Jury Final Repo...