El Dorado County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
• Agency Response
Final Draft Response to the*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 12
-
R1The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Auditor/Controller's office respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R2The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Chief Administrative Office respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R3The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Assessor's Office outline their policies and procedures used.
-
R4The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Counsel's Office respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R5The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County District Attorney's Office respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011. Final Draft Response to the 2011-12 El Dorado County Grand Jury
-
R6The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Information Technologies respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R7The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Probation Department respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R8The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Procurement and Support Services respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R9The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Public Defender respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011.
-
R10The Grand Jury recommends that the El Dorado County Sheriff's Department respond to our letter dated September 20, 2011. Board of Supervisors Response: The recommendations will not be implemented because they are not warranted. See response to Findings. Responses Reponses to both the findings and recommendations in this report are required by law in accordance with California Penal Code §933 and §933.05. Address responses to: The Honorable Suzanne N. Kingsbury, Presiding Judge of the El Dorado County Superior Court, 1354 Johnson Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Report has been provided to: El Dorado County Auditor/Controller El Dorado County Assessor El Dorado County Board of Supervisors El Dorado County Chief Administrative Office El Dorado County Counsel's Office El Dorado County District Attorney's Office El Dorado County Information Technologies El Dorado County Probation Department El Dorado County Procurement and Support Services El Dorado County Public Defender El Dorado County Sheriff's Department Final Draft Response to the 2011-12 El Dorado County Grand Jury -003 Reason for Report A complaint was received regarding non-compliance with the El Dorado County Business License Ordinance.
-
R11The Grand Jury recommends that the Treasurer/Tax Collector should have a copy of all the membership lists for Chambers of Commerce and other business related organizations within the County. Those lists should be compared annually to the "Business License - Active List."
-
R12The Grand Jury recommends that the Treasurer/Tax Collector publish a list of businesses that are not operating with a current Business License, monthly on the Treasurer/Tax Collector's website and in other public media. Responses Reponses to both the findings and recommendations in this report are required by law in accordance with California Penal Code §933 and §933.05. Address responses to: The Honorable Suzanne N. Kingsbury, Presiding Judge of the El Dorado County Superior Court, 1354 Johnson Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Report has been provided to the: El Dorado County Board of Supervisors El Dorado County Building Department El Dorado County Environmental Management Department
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.