San Francisco County Grand Jury
• 2000-2001
County Parole Board Report of the 2000-2001 San Francisco Civil Grand Jury
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
The Parole Board appears to be in violation of the Brown Act. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that a process or procedure be developed by the Sheriff's Office regarding the provisions of the Brown Act and their implementation as regards the County Parole Board. Required Response County Parole Board - 60 Days Sheriff - 60 Days
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Finding: The Parole Board appears to be in violation of the Brown Act. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that a process or procedure be developed by the Sheriff's Office regarding the provisions of the Brown Act and their implementation as regards the County Parole Board. Required Response County Parole Board - 60 Days Sheriff - 60 Days
F2
As a county agency provided for in state law, the County Parole Board is not subject to any county laws regarding annual report requirements. Therefore, though there have been some worthy initiatives and positive outcomes for the County Parole Board, there is no method by which to tell the public about them. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that the County Parole Board issue some type of statistical report on an annual basis. Required Response County Parole Board - 60 Days Sheriff - 60 Days
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Finding: As a county agency provided for in state law, the County Parole Board is not subject to any county laws regarding annual report requirements. Therefore, though there have been some worthy initiatives and positive outcomes for the County Parole Board, there is no method by which to tell the public about them. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that the County Parole Board issue some type of statistical report on an annual basis. Required Response County Parole Board - 60 Days Sheriff - 60 Days
F3
The vehicles used for warrant service are beginning to show their age. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that consideration be given to funding a new or more serviceable vehicle for the Alternative Programs Division. Required Response Sheriff - 60 Days ATTACHMENT 1 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY PAROLE BOARD RULES ATTACHMENT 2 SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ALTERNATE PROGRAMS DIVISION RESIDENTIAL COUNTY PAROLE ANNUAL REPORT YEAR 2000 ATTACHMENT 3 CITYWIDE CASE MANAGEMENT FORENSIC PROJECT FACT SHEET ATTACHMENT 4 ALTERNATE PROGRAMS DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 SALARIES AND OVERTIME
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Finding: The vehicles used for warrant service are beginning to show their age. Recommendation: The CGJ recommends that consideration be given to funding a new or more serviceable vehicle for the Alternative Programs Division. Required Response Sheriff - 60 Days ATTACHMENT 1 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY PAROLE BOARD RULES ATTACHMENT 2 SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ALTERNATE PROGRAMS DIVISION RESIDENTIAL COUNTY PAROLE ANNUAL REPORT YEAR 2000 ATTACHMENT 3 CITYWIDE CASE MANAGEMENT FORENSIC PROJECT FACT SHEET ATTACHMENT 4 ALTERNATE PROGRAMS DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 SALARIES AND OVERTIME