Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Adding Insult to Injury:

Published: May 28, 2025 15 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
The Grand Jury finds that as of December 2024, the Probation Department has failed to keep complete and accurate records resulting in an inability to track and evaluate data in the areas of offender recidivism, attendance, and completion/failure rates. (R1)
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends Probation and providers collect and record all data regarding offender’s recidivism, attendance, participation, and completion and input it in the BTP portal on a weekly basis starting January 1, 2026. (F1)
F2
The Grand Jury finds the BTP in Sacramento County uses an antiquated, ineffective, one-size-fits-all approach, resulting in a high failure rate. (R2)
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends Probation initiate a risk assessment evaluation for appropriate placement of offenders in a BTP tailored to meet individual needs by January 1, 2026. (F2)
F3
The Grand Jury finds Probation’s failure to perform a risk assessment at the conclusion of the BTP prevents an accurate determination of the offender’s potential to reoffend. (R3)
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Grand Jury recommends Probation add a risk assessment at the conclusion of the BTP by January 1, 2026, to determine the effectiveness of the program and increase support and treatment opportunities for those likely to reoffend. (F3)
F4
The Grand Jury finds Probation has failed to require that providers implement one type of an evidence-based program which has resulted in inconsistent counseling methods. (R4, R7)
Related Recommendations (2)
R4
The Grand Jury recommends Probation require all providers follow an evidence- based model that addresses individual needs by January 1, 2026. (F4)
R7
The Grand Jury recommends Probation collaborate with neighboring counties, especially those taking part in the pilot program such as Yolo County for shared knowledge and training of providers in the use of CBT by January 1, 2026. (F4)
F5
The Grand Jury finds Probation’s inadequate oversight of the certification of providers has resulted in providers being re-approved year after year without an assessment of their competency. (R5, R6)
Related Recommendations (2)
R5
The Grand Jury recommends that Probation implement a provider application and approval process, to include a formal Request for Qualifications (RFQ), for the certification and re-certification of providers by January 1, 2026. (F5)
R6
The Grand Jury recommends Probation solicit input from criminal justice agencies and domestic violence victim advocacy programs as required by statute for the development of the RFQ by January 1, 2026. (F5)
F6
The Grand Jury finds reliance on the Offenders-Pay- Model creates a financial barrier, thereby inhibiting the offender’s ability to enroll and complete the program and creating a financial burden for some providers. (R8)
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Grand Jury recommends Probation request funding from the Community Corrections Act (SB 678) and the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) and any state, federal, or other grant issuing entities to help subsidize payment of BTP fees for indigent offenders by June 30, 2026. (F6)
F7
The Grand Jury finds Probation’s refusal to allow online meetings under any circumstances serves as a barrier to BTP completion by offenders and presents financial hardships for some providers. (R9)
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The Grand Jury recommends Probation initiate hybrid video conference BTP meetings for offenders by January 1, 2026. (F7)
F8
The Grand Jury finds Probation lacks an in-house BTP that would enable indigent offenders to avoid weekly fees and receive their certification of completion in a timely manner. (R10)
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
The Grand Jury recommends Probation initiate an in-house BTP for offenders that meets the all of the conditions set forth in Penal Code Section 1203.099(a) by January 1, 2026. (F8)

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office