📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Kings County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Peoplesoft

Published: April 13, 2017 10 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 29
The Grand Jury finds that factors beyond the County’s control, such as employee turnover and software revisions, led to the delay in the implementation of the PeopleSoft payroll module.
F2 Page 29
The Grand Jury finds no basis in the allegation that the County was “pouring money into a system that was not operational” and further finds that the purchase of the licensing agreements from Oracle was conducted in compliance with County policy.
F3 Page 29
The Grand Jury could find no connection between the integration of the PeopleSoft program and employee turnover during the implementation phase.
F4 Page 29
The Grand Jury finds there is no personal connection between any employee of the IT Department and the company that created the PeopleSoft program, or between IT personnel and the company contracted to assist with the transition. No one in the IT Department benefited financially or personally from PeopleSoft’s implementation.

Recommendations 3