📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Alameda County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

Critical Technology Changes for the Alameda County Probation Department

View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

17-22 Page 82
By making decisions without ready access to necessary information, the Probation Department has been putting the public at risk. The lack of a comprehensive case management system prevents probation officers from effectively managing and tracking their workloads, properly evaluating their clients’ needs, and accurately identifying potential issues.
17-23 Page 82
The Probation Department has been unable to report accurate recidivism rates due to inadequate collection, storage and analysis of data.
17-24 Page 82
Probation decisions about which service and/or service provider is best for an individual client have not been sufficiently data driven. Service providers have been chosen based on anecdotal evidence of reputation and previous experience.
17-25 Page 82
Current Probation Department management structure doesn’t allow for focused attention on data collection and evidence-based analysis.
17-26 Page 82
In the past, staff has been reluctant to embrace/accept new technology and processes. Staff buy-in is critical to the success of any proposed changes.
17-27 Page 82
Recognizing that the department needs an integrated information system that includes case management, risk assessment, reporting, and an access portal for staff, management has begun addressing these issues, beginning with the purchase and installation of new software systems.

Recommendations 4