📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 4
-
R01-04Page 14The current requirement for employee liability insurance on their personal vehicles should be lowered to the State minimum requirement, which is $15,000 per person for bodily injury; $30,000 per incident for bodily injury; and $10,000 for property damage. VI. RESPONSE REQUIRED: Board of Supervisors: (01-04) Finance Department: (01-04) Golden State Risk Management Authority: (01-04) HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT I. PURPOSE: This was a routine inspection of the Glenn County Health Services Department. There were no complaints filed.
-
R01-16Page 13When an inspector notes a discrepancy and the permit holder disputes the inspector’s finding, the inspector should issue a written notice to the permit holder defining the code section in violation.
-
R01-17Page 13Inspectors that inspect the same job site at different times should insure that subsequent decisions are consistent with prior inspections.
-
R01-18Page 13Consider the development of a process that allows a contractor to receive a certificate of code compliance at job completion when the work performed meets all the requirements a permit was issued for. This would allow the contractor to seek payment from the customer, even if the customer had other issues that prevented the inspector from issuing a final clearance because of other code violations discovered on the job site unrelated to the work the permit was issued for. VI. RESPONSE REQUIRED: Board of Supervisors: (01-18) Building and Maintenance Inspection Director: (01-16, 01-17, 01-18) FINANCE DEPARTMENT I. PURPOSE: The Grand Jury reviewed the activities of the Finance Department. II. BACKGROUND: